Fujifilm XE2 vs. Ricoh GR
Comparison
change cameras »  

vs 


Fujifilm XE2  Ricoh GR  
check price »  check price » 
Megapixels
16.30
16.20
Max. image resolution
4896 x 3264
4928 x 3264
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
23.6 x 15.6 mm
23.6 x 15.7 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »

vs 

1  :  1.01 
(ratio)  
Fujifilm XE2  Ricoh GR 
Surface area:
368.16 mm²  vs  370.52 mm² 
Difference: 2.36 mm² (0.6%)
GR sensor is slightly bigger than XE2 sensor (only 0.6% difference).
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 0.28 µm² (1%)
A pixel on Ricoh GR sensor is approx. 1% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm XE2.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Fujifilm XE2
Ricoh GR
Total megapixels
16.70
16.90
Effective megapixels
16.30
16.20
Optical zoom
1x
Digital zoom
No
No
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 2006400, (100, 12800, 25600 with boost)
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 16000, 25600
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
30 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8  f16
Metering
Multi, Average, Spot
Multi, Centerweighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±4 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
300 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Builtin flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Electronic
Optical (optional)
White balance presets
7
9
Screen size
3"
3"
Screen resolution
1,040,000 dots
1,230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
NPW126 Liion battery
Rechargeable DB65 lithiumion battery
Weight
350 g
245 g
Dimensions
129 x 74.9 x 37.2 mm
117 x 61 x 34.7 mm
Year
2013
2013
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Fujifilm XM1
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Fujifilm X100S
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Alpha NEX7
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Olympus OMD EM1
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Canon EOS 7D
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMCGX7
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMCGM1
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Alpha 7
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Olympus OMD EM5
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Canon EOS 6D
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Fujifilm XE1
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √  w² + h² 
Fujifilm XE2 diagonal
w = 23.60 mm
h = 15.60 mm
h = 15.60 mm
Diagonal = √  23.60² + 15.60²  = 28.29 mm 
Ricoh GR diagonal
w = 23.60 mm
h = 15.70 mm
h = 15.70 mm
Diagonal = √  23.60² + 15.70²  = 28.35 mm 
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
XE2 sensor area
Width = 23.60 mm
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.60 × 15.60 = 368.16 mm²
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.60 × 15.60 = 368.16 mm²
GR sensor area
Width = 23.60 mm
Height = 15.70 mm
Surface area = 23.60 × 15.70 = 370.52 mm²
Height = 15.70 mm
Surface area = 23.60 × 15.70 = 370.52 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =  sensor width in mm  × 1000 
sensor resolution width in pixels 
XE2 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.60 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4962 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4962 pixels
Pixel pitch =  23.60  × 1000  = 4.76 µm 
4962 
GR pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.60 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4929 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4929 pixels
Pixel pitch =  23.60  × 1000  = 4.79 µm 
4929 
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =  sensor surface area in mm² 
effective megapixels 
XE2 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.76 µm
Pixel area = 4.76² = 22.66 µm²
Pixel area = 4.76² = 22.66 µm²
GR pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.79 µm
Pixel area = 4.79² = 22.94 µm²
Pixel area = 4.79² = 22.94 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = (  sensor resolution width in pixels  )² / 1000000 
sensor width in cm 
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =  effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000 
sensor surface area in mm² 
XE2 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4962 pixels
Sensor width = 2.36 cm
Pixel density = (4962 / 2.36)² / 1000000 = 4.42 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.36 cm
Pixel density = (4962 / 2.36)² / 1000000 = 4.42 MP/cm²
GR pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4929 pixels
Sensor width = 2.36 cm
Pixel density = (4929 / 2.36)² / 1000000 = 4.36 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.36 cm
Pixel density = (4929 / 2.36)² / 1000000 = 4.36 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → 

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
XE2 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.60 mm
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.30
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3286 × 1.51 = 4962
Resolution vertical: X = 3286
Sensor resolution = 4962 x 3286
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.30
r = 23.60/15.60 = 1.51 

Resolution vertical: X = 3286
Sensor resolution = 4962 x 3286
GR sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.60 mm
Sensor height = 15.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.20
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3286 × 1.5 = 4929
Resolution vertical: X = 3286
Sensor resolution = 4929 x 3286
Sensor height = 15.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.20
r = 23.60/15.70 = 1.5 

Resolution vertical: X = 3286
Sensor resolution = 4929 x 3286
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =  43.27 mm 
sensor diagonal in mm 
XE2 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.29 mm
Crop factor =  43.27  = 1.53 
28.29 
GR crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.35 mm
Crop factor =  43.27  = 1.53 
28.35 
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
XE2 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Fujifilm XE2, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Fujifilm XE2 is 1.53
Crop factor for Fujifilm XE2 is 1.53
GR equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 1.53
Aperture = f2.8  f16
35mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8  f16) × 1.53 = f4.3  f24.5
Aperture = f2.8  f16
35mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8  f16) × 1.53 = f4.3  f24.5
More comparisons of Fujifilm XE2:
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Cybershot DSCRX10
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Samsung NX300
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Cybershot DSCRX100 II
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Fujifilm X20
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Canon EOS 60D
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Alpha NEX6
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Fujifilm XPro1
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Canon PowerShot G1 X
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Fujifilm XT1
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Leica M9
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Ricoh GR
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Alpha a6000
 Fujifilm XE2 vs. Sony Alpha 7R
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.