Canon Digital IXUS v vs. Samsung ES95

Comparison

change cameras »

Canon Digital IXUS v

Samsung ES95

check price »

Megapixels

2.02

16.10

Max. image resolution

1600 x 1200

4608 x 3456

Sensor

Sensor type

CCD

Sensor size

1/2.7" (~ 5.33 x 4 mm)

1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)

Sensor resolution

1639 x 1232

4627 x 3479

Diagonal

6.66 mm

7.70 mm

Sensor size comparison

Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »

	vs
1	:	1.33
(ratio)

Canon Digital IXUS v		Samsung ES95

Surface area:

21.32 mm²

28.46 mm²

Difference: 7.14 mm² (33%)

ES95 sensor is approx. 1.33x bigger than IXUS v sensor.

Note: You are comparing sensors of vastly different generations. There is a gap of 12 years between Canon IXUS v (2001) and Samsung ES95 (2013). Twelve years is a huge amount of time, technology wise, resulting in newer sensor being much more efficient than the older one.

Pixel pitch

3.25 µm

1.33 µm

Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.

Difference: 1.92 µm (144%)

Pixel pitch of IXUS v is approx. 144% higher than pixel pitch of ES95.

Pixel area

10.56 µm²

1.77 µm²

Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.

Relative pixel sizes:

Pixel area difference: 8.79 µm² (497%)

A pixel on Canon IXUS v sensor is approx. 497% bigger than a pixel on Samsung ES95.

Pixel density

9.46 MP/cm²

56.42 MP/cm²

Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.

Difference: 46.96 µm (496%)

Samsung ES95 has approx. 496% higher pixel density than Canon IXUS v.

To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.

Specs

Canon IXUS v

Samsung ES95

Crop factor

6.5

5.62

Total megapixels

2.11

16.40

Effective megapixels

2.02

16.10

Optical zoom

Digital zoom

Yes

ISO sensitivity

100, 150

Auto, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200

RAW

Manual focus

Normal focus range

57 cm

80 cm

Macro focus range

10 cm

5 cm

Focal length (35mm equiv.)

35 - 70 mm

25 - 125 mm

Aperture priority

Max. aperture

f2.8 - f4

f2.5 - f6.3

Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)

f18.2 - f26

f14.1 - f35.4

Metering

Centre weighted

Multi, Center-weighted, Spot

Exposure compensation

±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)

Shutter priority

Min. shutter speed

1 sec

8 sec

Max. shutter speed

1/1500 sec

1/2000 sec

Built-in flash

External flash

Viewfinder

Optical

None

White balance presets

Screen size

1.5"

2.7"

Screen resolution

120,000 dots

230,000 dots

Video capture

Max. video resolution

Storage types

CompactFlash type I

microSD/microSDHC

USB

USB 1.1

USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)

HDMI

Wireless

GPS

Battery

Canon Lithium-Ion

BP70A

Weight

250 g

90 g

Dimensions

87 x 57 x 26.9 mm

91.6 x 55.2 x 17.5 mm

Year

2001

2013

Choose cameras to compare

Popular comparisons:

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:

Diagonal = √

w² + h²

where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Canon IXUS v diagonal

The diagonal of IXUS v sensor is not 1/2.7 or 0.37" (9.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 6.66 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm

Diagonal = √

5.33² + 4.00²

= 6.66 mm

Samsung ES95 diagonal

The diagonal of ES95 sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm

Diagonal = √

6.16² + 4.62²

= 7.70 mm

Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

IXUS v sensor area

Width = 5.33 mm
Height = 4.00 mm

Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²

ES95 sensor area

Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm

Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²

Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:

Pixel pitch =	sensor width in mm	× 1000
	sensor resolution width in pixels

IXUS v pixel pitch

Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1639 pixels

Pixel pitch =	5.33	× 1000	= 3.25 µm
	1639

ES95 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4627 pixels

Pixel pitch =	6.16	× 1000	= 1.33 µm
	4627

Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:

Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:

Pixel area =	sensor surface area in mm²
	effective megapixels

IXUS v pixel area

Pixel pitch = 3.25 µm

Pixel area = 3.25² = 10.56 µm²

ES95 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 1.33 µm

Pixel area = 1.33² = 1.77 µm²

Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:

Pixel density = (	sensor resolution width in pixels	)² / 1000000
	sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:

Pixel density =	effective megapixels × 1000000	/ 10000
	sensor surface area in mm²

IXUS v pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 1639 pixels
Sensor width = 0.533 cm

Pixel density = (1639 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 9.46 MP/cm²

ES95 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 4627 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm

Pixel density = (4627 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 56.42 MP/cm²

Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:

(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 →

X = √	effective megapixels × 1000000
	r

3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

IXUS v sensor resolution

Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.02

r = 5.33/4.00 = 1.33

X = √	2.02 × 1000000	= 1232
	1.33

Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1232 × 1.33 = 1639
Resolution vertical: X = 1232

Sensor resolution = 1639 x 1232

ES95 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.10

r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33

X = √	16.10 × 1000000	= 3479
	1.33

Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3479 × 1.33 = 4627
Resolution vertical: X = 3479

Sensor resolution = 4627 x 3479

Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.

Crop factor =	43.27 mm
	sensor diagonal in mm

IXUS v crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.66 mm

Crop factor =	43.27	= 6.5
	6.66

ES95 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm

Crop factor =	43.27	= 5.62
	7.70

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

IXUS v equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 6.5
Aperture = f2.8 - f4

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4) × 6.5 = f18.2 - f26

ES95 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f2.5 - f6.3

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.5 - f6.3) × 5.62 = f14.1 - f35.4

More comparisons of Canon IXUS v:

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is inches

Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.