Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Olympus C-765 UZ
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Casio Exilim EX-P600 | Olympus C-765 UZ | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
5.90
3.90
Max. image resolution
2816 x 2112
3200 x 2400
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1.53 | : | 1 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Casio Exilim EX-P600 | Olympus C-765 UZ | |
Surface area:
| 37.90 mm² | vs | 24.84 mm² |
Difference: 13.06 mm² (53%)
P600 sensor is approx. 1.53x bigger than C-765 UZ sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 0.05 µm² (0.8%)
A pixel on Casio P600 sensor is approx. 0.8% bigger than a pixel on Olympus C-765 UZ.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Casio P600
Olympus C-765 UZ
Total megapixels
6.10
4.10
Effective megapixels
5.90
3.90
Optical zoom
4x
10x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100, 200, 400
50, 100, 200, 400
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
40 cm
60 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
3 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
33 - 132 mm
38 - 380 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.0
f2.8 - f3.7
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
ESP Digital, Multi Spot, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
60 sec
16 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/1000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (tunnel)
Electronic
White balance presets
7
7
Screen size
2"
1.8"
Screen resolution
115,200 dots
114,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
SD/MMC card, Internal
xD Picture card
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-Ion rechargeable
Lithium-Ion rechargeable
Weight
275 g
280 g
Dimensions
98 x 68 x 45 mm
104.5 x 60 x 68.5 mm
Year
2004
2004
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Casio Exilim EX-P700
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Casio Exilim EX-Z850
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Nikon D5500
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Canon PowerShot G5
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Casio Exilim EX-Z600
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Casio Exilim EX-P505
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Canon PowerShot A650 IS
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Olympus SP 320
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Canon PowerShot SX200 IS
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Kodak DC4800
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Casio P600 diagonal
The diagonal of P600 sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 7.11² + 5.33² | = 8.89 mm |
Olympus C-765 UZ diagonal
The diagonal of C-765 UZ sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
P600 sensor area
Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
C-765 UZ sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
P600 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2801 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2801 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 7.11 | × 1000 | = 2.54 µm |
| 2801 |
C-765 UZ pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2277 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2277 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 2.53 µm |
| 2277 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
P600 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.54 µm
Pixel area = 2.54² = 6.45 µm²
Pixel area = 2.54² = 6.45 µm²
C-765 UZ pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.53 µm
Pixel area = 2.53² = 6.4 µm²
Pixel area = 2.53² = 6.4 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
P600 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2801 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (2801 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 15.52 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (2801 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 15.52 MP/cm²
C-765 UZ pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2277 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2277 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 15.68 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2277 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 15.68 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
P600 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.90
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2106 × 1.33 = 2801
Resolution vertical: X = 2106
Sensor resolution = 2801 x 2106
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.90
| r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2106
Sensor resolution = 2801 x 2106
C-765 UZ sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.90
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1712 × 1.33 = 2277
Resolution vertical: X = 1712
Sensor resolution = 2277 x 1712
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.90
| r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1712
Sensor resolution = 2277 x 1712
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
P600 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.87 |
| 8.89 |
C-765 UZ crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
| 7.19 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
P600 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.0
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.0) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f19.5
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.0
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.0) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f19.5
C-765 UZ equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f22.3
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f22.3
More comparisons of Casio P600:
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Kodak EasyShare C763
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Canon EOS M
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Fujifilm FinePix S1500
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Sony Alpha NEX-6
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Nikon Coolpix P1
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Canon PowerShot G1 X
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Nikon D80
- Casio Exilim EX-P600 vs. Olympus C-765 UZ
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.