Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 vs. Olympus E-520

Comparison

change cameras »
Exilim EX-ZR200 image
vs
E-520 image
Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 Olympus E-520
check price » check price »
Megapixels
16.10
10.00
Max. image resolution
4608 x 3456
3648 x 2736

Sensor

Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)
Sensor resolution
4627 x 3479
3647 x 2742
Diagonal
7.70 mm
21.64 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
vs
1 : 7.9
(ratio)
Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 Olympus E-520
Surface area:
28.46 mm² vs 224.90 mm²
Difference: 196.44 mm² (690%)
E-520 sensor is approx. 7.9x bigger than ZR200 sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 3 year gap between Casio ZR200 (2011) and Olympus E-520 (2008). All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch
1.33 µm
4.74 µm
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Difference: 3.41 µm (256%)
Pixel pitch of E-520 is approx. 256% higher than pixel pitch of ZR200.
Pixel area
1.77 µm²
22.47 µm²
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 20.7 µm² (1169%)
A pixel on Olympus E-520 sensor is approx. 1169% bigger than a pixel on Casio ZR200.
Pixel density
56.42 MP/cm²
4.44 MP/cm²
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Difference: 51.98 µm (1171%)
Casio ZR200 has approx. 1171% higher pixel density than Olympus E-520.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.



Specs

Casio ZR200
Olympus E-520
Crop factor
5.62
2
Total megapixels
16.80
11.80
Effective megapixels
16.10
10.00
Optical zoom
12.5x
Digital zoom
Yes
No
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 80 - 3200
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
Macro focus range
5 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24 - 300 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f3.0 - f5.9
Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)
f16.9 - f33.2
n/a
Metering
Centre weighted, Multi-pattern, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
60 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/25000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
Optical (pentamirror)
White balance presets
7
8
Screen size
3"
2.7"
Screen resolution
460,800 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
SDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-ion NP-130 rechargeable battery
Lithium-Ion rechargeable
Weight
205 g
552 g
Dimensions
104.8 x 59.1 x 28.6 mm
136 x 92 x 68 mm
Year
2011
2008




Choose cameras to compare

vs

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
Diagonal =  w² + h²
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Casio ZR200 diagonal

The diagonal of ZR200 sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
Diagonal =  6.16² + 4.62²   = 7.70 mm

Olympus E-520 diagonal

w = 17.30 mm
h = 13.00 mm
Diagonal =  17.30² + 13.00²   = 21.64 mm


Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

ZR200 sensor area

Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm

Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²

E-520 sensor area

Width = 17.30 mm
Height = 13.00 mm

Surface area = 17.30 × 13.00 = 224.90 mm²


Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =   sensor width in mm  × 1000
sensor resolution width in pixels

ZR200 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4627 pixels
Pixel pitch =   6.16  × 1000  = 1.33 µm
4627

E-520 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 17.30 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3647 pixels
Pixel pitch =   17.30  × 1000  = 4.74 µm
3647


Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =   sensor surface area in mm²
effective megapixels

ZR200 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 1.33 µm

Pixel area = 1.33² = 1.77 µm²

E-520 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 4.74 µm

Pixel area = 4.74² = 22.47 µm²


Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel density =  ( sensor resolution width in pixels )² / 1000000
sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =   effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000
sensor surface area in mm²

ZR200 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 4627 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm

Pixel density = (4627 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 56.42 MP/cm²

E-520 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 3647 pixels
Sensor width = 1.73 cm

Pixel density = (3647 / 1.73)² / 1000000 = 4.44 MP/cm²


Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000    →   
X =  effective megapixels × 1000000
r
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

ZR200 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.10
r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33
X =  16.10 × 1000000  = 3479
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3479 × 1.33 = 4627
Resolution vertical: X = 3479

Sensor resolution = 4627 x 3479

E-520 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 17.30 mm
Sensor height = 13.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 10.00
r = 17.30/13.00 = 1.33
X =  10.00 × 1000000  = 2742
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2742 × 1.33 = 3647
Resolution vertical: X = 2742

Sensor resolution = 3647 x 2742


Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =   43.27 mm
sensor diagonal in mm


ZR200 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 5.62
7.70

E-520 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 21.64 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 2
21.64

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

ZR200 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f3.0 - f5.9

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.0 - f5.9) × 5.62 = f16.9 - f33.2

E-520 equivalent aperture

Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Olympus E-520, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor.

Crop factor for Olympus E-520 is 2

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.