Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Ricoh WG-50
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Fujifilm FinePix XP140 | Ricoh WG-50 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
16.40
16.00
Max. image resolution
4608 x 3456
4608 x 3456
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1 |
(ratio) | ||
Fujifilm FinePix XP140 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Surface area:
28.46 mm² | vs | 28.46 mm² |
Difference: 0 mm² (0%)
XP140 and WG-50 sensors are the same size.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 2 year gap between Fujifilm XP140 (2019) and Ricoh WG-50 (2017).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 0.06 µm² (3%)
A pixel on Ricoh WG-50 sensor is approx. 3% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm XP140.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Fujifilm XP140
Ricoh WG-50
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
16.40
16.00
Optical zoom
5x
5x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100-12800
Auto, 125-6400
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
Macro focus range
9 cm
1 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 - 140 mm
28 - 140 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f3.9 - f4.9
f3.5 - f5.5
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
4 sec
4 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
None
White balance presets
5
6
Screen size
3"
2.7"
Screen resolution
921,600 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
3840x2160 (15p)
1920x1080 (30p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Li-ion battery NP-45S
D-LI92 lithium-ion battery
Weight
207 g
193 g
Dimensions
109.6 x 71 x 27.8 mm
122.5 x 61.5 x 29.5 mm
Year
2019
2017
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP130
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT30
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Olympus Tough TG-6
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Nikon Coolpix W150
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP120
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Nikon Coolpix W300
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP80
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP70
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-FT7
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Nikon Coolpix AW130
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP60
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Fujifilm XP140 diagonal
The diagonal of XP140 sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
Diagonal = √ | 6.16² + 4.62² | = 7.70 mm |
Ricoh WG-50 diagonal
The diagonal of WG-50 sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
Diagonal = √ | 6.16² + 4.62² | = 7.70 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
XP140 sensor area
Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
WG-50 sensor area
Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
XP140 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4671 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4671 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 6.16 | × 1000 | = 1.32 µm |
4671 |
WG-50 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4612 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4612 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 6.16 | × 1000 | = 1.34 µm |
4612 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
XP140 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.32 µm
Pixel area = 1.32² = 1.74 µm²
Pixel area = 1.32² = 1.74 µm²
WG-50 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.34 µm
Pixel area = 1.34² = 1.8 µm²
Pixel area = 1.34² = 1.8 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
XP140 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4671 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4671 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 57.5 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4671 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 57.5 MP/cm²
WG-50 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4612 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4612 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 56.06 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4612 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 56.06 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
XP140 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.40
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3512 × 1.33 = 4671
Resolution vertical: X = 3512
Sensor resolution = 4671 x 3512
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.40
r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3512
Sensor resolution = 4671 x 3512
WG-50 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3468 × 1.33 = 4612
Resolution vertical: X = 3468
Sensor resolution = 4612 x 3468
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.00
r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3468
Sensor resolution = 4612 x 3468
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
XP140 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.62 |
7.70 |
WG-50 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.62 |
7.70 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
XP140 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f3.9 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.9 - f4.9) × 5.62 = f21.9 - f27.5
Aperture = f3.9 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.9 - f4.9) × 5.62 = f21.9 - f27.5
WG-50 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f3.5 - f5.5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.5 - f5.5) × 5.62 = f19.7 - f30.9
Aperture = f3.5 - f5.5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.5 - f5.5) × 5.62 = f19.7 - f30.9
More comparisons of Fujifilm XP140:
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Canon IXUS 285 HS
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Ricoh WG-6
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Nikon Coolpix W100
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Ricoh WG-50
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
- Fujifilm FinePix XP140 vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP100
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.