Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Olympus OM-1
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Fujifilm X-T5 | Olympus OM-1 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
40.20
20.40
Max. image resolution
7728 x 5152
5184 x 3888
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1.64 | : | 1 |
(ratio) | ||
Fujifilm X-T5 | Olympus OM-1 |
Surface area:
368.95 mm² | vs | 224.90 mm² |
Difference: 144.05 mm² (64%)
X-T5 sensor is approx. 1.64x bigger than OM-1 sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 1.84 µm² (20%)
A pixel on Olympus OM-1 sensor is approx. 20% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-T5.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Fujifilm X-T5
Olympus OM-1
Total megapixels
22.90
Effective megapixels
40.20
20.40
Optical zoom
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 125-12800 (extends to 64-51200)
Auto, 80-25600 (expandable to 102400)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Average, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Highlight, Spot
Exposure compensation
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 1 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
60 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/180000 sec
1/32000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Electronic
Electronic
White balance presets
7
6
Screen size
3"
3"
Screen resolution
1,840,000 dots
1,620,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
6240x3510 (30p/25p/24p/23.98p)
4096x2160 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC, UHS-I/II
SD/SDHC/SDXC, UHS-I/II
USB
USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
NP-W235 lithium-ion battery
BLX-1 Lithium-ion battery
Weight
557 g
599 g
Dimensions
129.5 x 91 x 63.8 mm
134.8 x 91.6 x 72.7 mm
Year
2022
2022
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Nikon Z6 II
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Canon EOS R7
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Sony A7 IV
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Nikon Z5
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Fujifilm X-H2
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Sony Alpha A7 III
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Fujifilm X-T3
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Olympus OM-1
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Sony Alpha a7R III
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Fujifilm X-T4
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs. Fujifilm X-T30 II
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Fujifilm X-T5 diagonal
w = 23.50 mm
h = 15.70 mm
h = 15.70 mm
Diagonal = √ | 23.50² + 15.70² | = 28.26 mm |
Olympus OM-1 diagonal
w = 17.30 mm
h = 13.00 mm
h = 13.00 mm
Diagonal = √ | 17.30² + 13.00² | = 21.64 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
X-T5 sensor area
Width = 23.50 mm
Height = 15.70 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.70 = 368.95 mm²
Height = 15.70 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.70 = 368.95 mm²
OM-1 sensor area
Width = 17.30 mm
Height = 13.00 mm
Surface area = 17.30 × 13.00 = 224.90 mm²
Height = 13.00 mm
Surface area = 17.30 × 13.00 = 224.90 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
X-T5 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor resolution width = 7766 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 7766 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 23.50 | × 1000 | = 3.03 µm |
7766 |
OM-1 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 17.30 mm
Sensor resolution width = 5208 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 5208 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 17.30 | × 1000 | = 3.32 µm |
5208 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
X-T5 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.03 µm
Pixel area = 3.03² = 9.18 µm²
Pixel area = 3.03² = 9.18 µm²
OM-1 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.32 µm
Pixel area = 3.32² = 11.02 µm²
Pixel area = 3.32² = 11.02 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
X-T5 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 7766 pixels
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (7766 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 10.92 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (7766 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 10.92 MP/cm²
OM-1 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 5208 pixels
Sensor width = 1.73 cm
Pixel density = (5208 / 1.73)² / 1000000 = 9.06 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 1.73 cm
Pixel density = (5208 / 1.73)² / 1000000 = 9.06 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
X-T5 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor height = 15.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 40.20
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 5177 × 1.5 = 7766
Resolution vertical: X = 5177
Sensor resolution = 7766 x 5177
Sensor height = 15.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 40.20
r = 23.50/15.70 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 5177
Sensor resolution = 7766 x 5177
OM-1 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 17.30 mm
Sensor height = 13.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 20.40
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3916 × 1.33 = 5208
Resolution vertical: X = 3916
Sensor resolution = 5208 x 3916
Sensor height = 13.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 20.40
r = 17.30/13.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3916
Sensor resolution = 5208 x 3916
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
X-T5 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.26 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.53 |
28.26 |
OM-1 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 21.64 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 2 |
21.64 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
X-T5 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Fujifilm X-T5, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Fujifilm X-T5 is 1.53
Crop factor for Fujifilm X-T5 is 1.53
OM-1 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Olympus OM-1, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Olympus OM-1 is 2
Crop factor for Olympus OM-1 is 2
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.