Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Samsung NX2000
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Kodak PixPro S-1 | Samsung NX2000 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
16.83
20.30
Max. image resolution
4640 x 3480
5472 x 3648
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)
23.5 x 15.7 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1.64 |
(ratio) | ||
Kodak PixPro S-1 | Samsung NX2000 |
Surface area:
224.90 mm² | vs | 368.95 mm² |
Difference: 144.05 mm² (64%)
NX2000 sensor is approx. 1.64x bigger than S-1 sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 4.75 µm² (35%)
A pixel on Samsung NX2000 sensor is approx. 35% bigger than a pixel on Kodak S-1.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Kodak S-1
Samsung NX2000
Total megapixels
21.60
Effective megapixels
16.83
20.30
Optical zoom
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 200-12800
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
None
White balance presets
6
8
Screen size
3"
3.7"
Screen resolution
920,000 dots
1,152,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
1920x1080 (30p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Rechargeable Li-ion Battery LB-070
Lithium-Ion BP1130 battery
Weight
290 g
228 g
Dimensions
115.7 x 67.4 x 35.6 mm
119 x 65 x 36 mm
Year
2014
2013
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Sony Alpha a6000
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Nikon 1 J3
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Canon EOS 2000D
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Canon EOS Rebel T5
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Kodak PixPro AZ651
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Samsung NX2000
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Nikon D5100
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Canon EOS 77D
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Kodak S-1 diagonal
w = 17.30 mm
h = 13.00 mm
h = 13.00 mm
Diagonal = √ | 17.30² + 13.00² | = 21.64 mm |
Samsung NX2000 diagonal
w = 23.50 mm
h = 15.70 mm
h = 15.70 mm
Diagonal = √ | 23.50² + 15.70² | = 28.26 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
S-1 sensor area
Width = 17.30 mm
Height = 13.00 mm
Surface area = 17.30 × 13.00 = 224.90 mm²
Height = 13.00 mm
Surface area = 17.30 × 13.00 = 224.90 mm²
NX2000 sensor area
Width = 23.50 mm
Height = 15.70 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.70 = 368.95 mm²
Height = 15.70 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.70 = 368.95 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
S-1 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 17.30 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4731 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4731 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 17.30 | × 1000 | = 3.66 µm |
4731 |
NX2000 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor resolution width = 5519 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 5519 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 23.50 | × 1000 | = 4.26 µm |
5519 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
S-1 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.66 µm
Pixel area = 3.66² = 13.4 µm²
Pixel area = 3.66² = 13.4 µm²
NX2000 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.26 µm
Pixel area = 4.26² = 18.15 µm²
Pixel area = 4.26² = 18.15 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
S-1 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4731 pixels
Sensor width = 1.73 cm
Pixel density = (4731 / 1.73)² / 1000000 = 7.48 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 1.73 cm
Pixel density = (4731 / 1.73)² / 1000000 = 7.48 MP/cm²
NX2000 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 5519 pixels
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (5519 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 5.52 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (5519 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 5.52 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
S-1 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 17.30 mm
Sensor height = 13.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.83
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3557 × 1.33 = 4731
Resolution vertical: X = 3557
Sensor resolution = 4731 x 3557
Sensor height = 13.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.83
r = 17.30/13.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3557
Sensor resolution = 4731 x 3557
NX2000 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor height = 15.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 20.30
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3679 × 1.5 = 5519
Resolution vertical: X = 3679
Sensor resolution = 5519 x 3679
Sensor height = 15.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 20.30
r = 23.50/15.70 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3679
Sensor resolution = 5519 x 3679
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
S-1 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 21.64 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 2 |
21.64 |
NX2000 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.26 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.53 |
28.26 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
S-1 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Kodak S-1, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Kodak S-1 is 2
Crop factor for Kodak S-1 is 2
NX2000 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Samsung NX2000, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Samsung NX2000 is 1.53
Crop factor for Samsung NX2000 is 1.53
More comparisons of Kodak S-1:
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX1
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Leica X2
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Sony Alpha a6300
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Nikon Coolpix A100
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Kodak EasyShare C875
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Kodak EasyShare Z981
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Nikon D5300
- Kodak PixPro S-1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.