Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M-E Typ 220
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Leica M-E (Typ 240) | Leica M-E Typ 220 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
24.00
18.00
Max. image resolution
5976 x 3992
5212 x 3472
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CCD
Sensor size
35.8 x 23.9 mm
35.8 x 23.9 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1 |
(ratio) | ||
Leica M-E (Typ 240) | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Surface area:
855.62 mm² | vs | 855.62 mm² |
Difference: 0 mm² (0%)
M-E (Typ 240) and M-E Typ 220 sensors are the same size.
Note: You are comparing sensors of very different generations.
There is a gap of 7 years between Leica M-E (Typ 240) (2019) and Leica M-E Typ 220 (2012).
Seven years is a lot of time in terms
of technology, meaning newer sensors are overall much more
efficient than the older ones.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 11.83 µm² (33%)
A pixel on Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor is approx. 33% bigger than a pixel on Leica M-E (Typ 240).
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Leica M-E (Typ 240)
Leica M-E Typ 220
Total megapixels
18.50
Effective megapixels
24.00
18.00
Optical zoom
Digital zoom
No
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 200 - 6400
Auto, Pull 80, 160, 200, 250, 320, 400, 500, 640, 800, 1000, 1250, 1600, 2000, 2500
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
Metering
Center-weighted
Center-weighted
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
No
Min. shutter speed
8 sec
4 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (rangefinder)
Optical (rangefinder)
White balance presets
7
6
Screen size
3"
2.5"
Screen resolution
921,600 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
1920×1080 (25p/24p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
SD/SDHC card
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-ion battery
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery
Weight
680 g
585 g
Dimensions
138.6 x 42 x 80 mm
139 x 80 x 37 mm
Year
2019
2012
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M-P
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M10 (Typ 3656)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M (Typ 262)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M Typ 240
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica Q2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X-Pro3
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Sony Alpha A7 III
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X100V
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M-E Typ 220
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica SL (Typ 601)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica CL
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Leica M-E (Typ 240) diagonal
w = 35.80 mm
h = 23.90 mm
h = 23.90 mm
Diagonal = √ | 35.80² + 23.90² | = 43.04 mm |
Leica M-E Typ 220 diagonal
w = 35.80 mm
h = 23.90 mm
h = 23.90 mm
Diagonal = √ | 35.80² + 23.90² | = 43.04 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
M-E (Typ 240) sensor area
Width = 35.80 mm
Height = 23.90 mm
Surface area = 35.80 × 23.90 = 855.62 mm²
Height = 23.90 mm
Surface area = 35.80 × 23.90 = 855.62 mm²
M-E Typ 220 sensor area
Width = 35.80 mm
Height = 23.90 mm
Surface area = 35.80 × 23.90 = 855.62 mm²
Height = 23.90 mm
Surface area = 35.80 × 23.90 = 855.62 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
M-E (Typ 240) pixel pitch
Sensor width = 35.80 mm
Sensor resolution width = 6000 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 6000 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 35.80 | × 1000 | = 5.97 µm |
6000 |
M-E Typ 220 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 35.80 mm
Sensor resolution width = 5196 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 5196 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 35.80 | × 1000 | = 6.89 µm |
5196 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
M-E (Typ 240) pixel area
Pixel pitch = 5.97 µm
Pixel area = 5.97² = 35.64 µm²
Pixel area = 5.97² = 35.64 µm²
M-E Typ 220 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 6.89 µm
Pixel area = 6.89² = 47.47 µm²
Pixel area = 6.89² = 47.47 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
M-E (Typ 240) pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 6000 pixels
Sensor width = 3.58 cm
Pixel density = (6000 / 3.58)² / 1000000 = 2.81 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 3.58 cm
Pixel density = (6000 / 3.58)² / 1000000 = 2.81 MP/cm²
M-E Typ 220 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 5196 pixels
Sensor width = 3.58 cm
Pixel density = (5196 / 3.58)² / 1000000 = 2.11 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 3.58 cm
Pixel density = (5196 / 3.58)² / 1000000 = 2.11 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
M-E (Typ 240) sensor resolution
Sensor width = 35.80 mm
Sensor height = 23.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 4000 × 1.5 = 6000
Resolution vertical: X = 4000
Sensor resolution = 6000 x 4000
Sensor height = 23.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.00
r = 35.80/23.90 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 4000
Sensor resolution = 6000 x 4000
M-E Typ 220 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 35.80 mm
Sensor height = 23.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 18.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3464 × 1.5 = 5196
Resolution vertical: X = 3464
Sensor resolution = 5196 x 3464
Sensor height = 23.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 18.00
r = 35.80/23.90 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3464
Sensor resolution = 5196 x 3464
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
M-E (Typ 240) crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 43.04 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.01 |
43.04 |
M-E Typ 220 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 43.04 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.01 |
43.04 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
M-E (Typ 240) equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Leica M-E (Typ 240), take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Leica M-E (Typ 240) is 1.01
Crop factor for Leica M-E (Typ 240) is 1.01
M-E Typ 220 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Leica M-E Typ 220, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Leica M-E Typ 220 is 1.01
Crop factor for Leica M-E Typ 220 is 1.01
More comparisons of Leica M-E (Typ 240):
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Sony Alpha 7 II
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M8.2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica SL2-S
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Nikon D700
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica Q (Typ 116)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica SL2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Sony Alpha a7R III
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Ricoh GR III
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X-T3
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.