Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Kodak EasyShare CX6230
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix 3700 | Kodak EasyShare CX6230 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
3.10
2.00
Max. image resolution
2048 x 1536
1650 x 1250
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.7" (~ 5.33 x 4 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1.17 |
(ratio) | ||
Nikon Coolpix 3700 | Kodak EasyShare CX6230 |
Surface area:
21.32 mm² | vs | 24.84 mm² |
Difference: 3.52 mm² (17%)
CX6230 sensor is approx. 1.17x bigger than 3700 sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 5.6 µm² (82%)
A pixel on Kodak CX6230 sensor is approx. 82% bigger than a pixel on Nikon 3700.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Nikon 3700
Kodak CX6230
Total megapixels
3.30
2.10
Effective megapixels
3.10
2.00
Optical zoom
3x
3x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, (50 - 200)
Auto, (100,200)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
30 cm
50 cm
Macro focus range
3 cm
10 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 - 105 mm
36 - 108 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.9
f2.8 - f4.7
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Centre weighted
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/2 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
4 sec
1/2 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/3000 sec
1/1700 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (tunnel)
Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
5
4
Screen size
1.5"
1.5"
Screen resolution
134,000 dots
153,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
SD card
MultiMedia, Secure Digital
USB
USB 1.0
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Nikon EN-EL5 Lithium-Ion
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Weight
162 g
175 g
Dimensions
96 x 50 x 31 mm
104 x 67 x 42 mm
Year
2003
2003
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Nikon Coolpix S7000
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Samsung WB35F
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon PowerShot ELPH 160
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Nikon Coolpix S6800
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Fujifilm FinePix S8600
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P200
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon IXUS 132
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Nikon 3700 diagonal
The diagonal of 3700 sensor is not 1/2.7 or 0.37" (9.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 6.66 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
Diagonal = √ | 5.33² + 4.00² | = 6.66 mm |
Kodak CX6230 diagonal
The diagonal of CX6230 sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
3700 sensor area
Width = 5.33 mm
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
CX6230 sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
3700 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 5.33 | × 1000 | = 2.62 µm |
2031 |
CX6230 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 3.53 µm |
1631 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
3700 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.62 µm
Pixel area = 2.62² = 6.86 µm²
Pixel area = 2.62² = 6.86 µm²
CX6230 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.53 µm
Pixel area = 3.53² = 12.46 µm²
Pixel area = 3.53² = 12.46 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
3700 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 14.52 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 14.52 MP/cm²
CX6230 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (1631 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 8.05 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (1631 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 8.05 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
3700 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1527 × 1.33 = 2031
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
r = 5.33/4.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
CX6230 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1226 × 1.33 = 1631
Resolution vertical: X = 1226
Sensor resolution = 1631 x 1226
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.00
r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1226
Sensor resolution = 1631 x 1226
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
3700 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.66 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.5 |
6.66 |
CX6230 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
7.19 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
3700 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.5
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.5 = f18.2 - f31.9
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.5 = f18.2 - f31.9
CX6230 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f28.3
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f28.3
More comparisons of Nikon 3700:
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z3
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Sony Alpha NEX-5
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS40
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Nikon Coolpix 5200
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Kodak EasyShare C875
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon Digital IXUS 110 IS
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Kodak EasyShare CX6230
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Nikon Coolpix L29
- Nikon Coolpix 3700 vs. Canon PowerShot A470
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.