Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Olympus FE-26
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Olympus SP 510 UZ | Olympus FE-26 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
7.10
12.70
Max. image resolution
3072 x 2304
3968 x 2976
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
1/2.33" (~ 6.08 x 4.56 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1.12 |
(ratio) | ||
Olympus SP 510 UZ | Olympus FE-26 |
Surface area:
24.84 mm² | vs | 27.72 mm² |
Difference: 2.88 mm² (12%)
FE-26 sensor is approx. 1.12x bigger than SP 510 UZ sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 3 year gap between Olympus SP 510 UZ (2006) and Olympus FE-26 (2009).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 1.31 µm² (60%)
A pixel on Olympus SP 510 UZ sensor is approx. 60% bigger than a pixel on Olympus FE-26.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Olympus SP 510 UZ
Olympus FE-26
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
Optical zoom
Yes
Yes
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 2500, 4000
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1000
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
60 cm
60 cm
Macro focus range
3 cm
5 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
38 - 380 mm
36 - 108 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f3.7
f3.1 - f5.9
Metering
Centre weighted, ESP Digital, Spot
ESP Digital
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
15 sec
1 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
1/2000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Electronic
None
White balance presets
6
7
Screen size
2.5"
2.7"
Screen resolution
115,000 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
xD Picture card
xD Picture card
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
4x AA
2x AA
Weight
325 g
117 g
Dimensions
105.5 x 74.5 x 70.0 mm
96 x 62 x 27 mm
Year
2006
2009
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Olympus SP 550 UZ
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Olympus SP 500 UZ
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H100
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Olympus SP-565UZ
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Olympus SP 560 UZ
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Nikon Coolpix P90
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Fujifilm FinePix S2950
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Kodak PixPro AZ521
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Canon PowerShot A570 IS
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1
- Olympus SP 510 UZ vs. Samsung WB350F
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Olympus SP 510 UZ diagonal
The diagonal of SP 510 UZ sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Olympus FE-26 diagonal
The diagonal of FE-26 sensor is not 1/2.33 or 0.43" (10.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.6 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.08 mm
h = 4.56 mm
w = 6.08 mm
h = 4.56 mm
Diagonal = √ | 6.08² + 4.56² | = 7.60 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
SP 510 UZ sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
FE-26 sensor area
Width = 6.08 mm
Height = 4.56 mm
Surface area = 6.08 × 4.56 = 27.72 mm²
Height = 4.56 mm
Surface area = 6.08 × 4.56 = 27.72 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
SP 510 UZ pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3072 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3072 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 1.87 µm |
3072 |
FE-26 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4110 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4110 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 6.08 | × 1000 | = 1.48 µm |
4110 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
SP 510 UZ pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.87 µm
Pixel area = 1.87² = 3.5 µm²
Pixel area = 1.87² = 3.5 µm²
FE-26 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.48 µm
Pixel area = 1.48² = 2.19 µm²
Pixel area = 1.48² = 2.19 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
SP 510 UZ pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3072 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (3072 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 28.54 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (3072 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 28.54 MP/cm²
FE-26 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4110 pixels
Sensor width = 0.608 cm
Pixel density = (4110 / 0.608)² / 1000000 = 45.7 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.608 cm
Pixel density = (4110 / 0.608)² / 1000000 = 45.7 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
SP 510 UZ sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 7.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2310 × 1.33 = 3072
Resolution vertical: X = 2310
Sensor resolution = 3072 x 2310
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 7.10
r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2310
Sensor resolution = 3072 x 2310
FE-26 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor height = 4.56 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.70
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3090 × 1.33 = 4110
Resolution vertical: X = 3090
Sensor resolution = 4110 x 3090
Sensor height = 4.56 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.70
r = 6.08/4.56 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3090
Sensor resolution = 4110 x 3090
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
SP 510 UZ crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
7.19 |
FE-26 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.60 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.69 |
7.60 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
SP 510 UZ equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f22.3
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f22.3
FE-26 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.69
Aperture = f3.1 - f5.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.1 - f5.9) × 5.69 = f17.6 - f33.6
Aperture = f3.1 - f5.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.1 - f5.9) × 5.69 = f17.6 - f33.6
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.