Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Canon EOS-1D Mark III | Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
10.10
16.70
Max. image resolution
3888 x 2592
4992 x 3328
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
28.7 x 18.7 mm
36 x 24 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 1.61 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Canon EOS-1D Mark III | Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II | |
Surface area:
| 536.69 mm² | vs | 864.00 mm² |
Difference: 327.31 mm² (61%)
-1Ds Mark II sensor is approx. 1.61x bigger than -1D Mark III sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 3 year gap between Canon -1D Mark III (2007) and Canon -1Ds Mark II (2004).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 1.59 µm² (3%)
A pixel on Canon -1D Mark III sensor is approx. 3% bigger than a pixel on Canon -1Ds Mark II.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Canon -1D Mark III
Canon -1Ds Mark II
Total megapixels
10.70
17.20
Effective megapixels
10.10
16.70
Optical zoom
Digital zoom
No
No
ISO sensitivity
100 - 3200 in 1/3 stops, plus 50 and 6400
100 - 1600 in 1/3 stops, plus 50, 3200 as option
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (pentaprism)
Optical (pentaprism)
White balance presets
8
8
Screen size
3"
2"
Screen resolution
230,000 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD/SDHC card
Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD card
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-Ion NB-4L battery
Lithium-Ion NB-4L battery
Weight
1335 g
1565 g
Dimensions
156 x 157 x 80 mm
156 x 158 x 80 mm
Year
2007
2004
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark II
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 7D
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS-1D Mark IV
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 6D
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS-1D Mark II
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 50D
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 60D
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS 5D
- Canon EOS-1D Mark III vs. Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Canon -1D Mark III diagonal
w = 28.70 mm
h = 18.70 mm
h = 18.70 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 28.70² + 18.70² | = 34.25 mm |
Canon -1Ds Mark II diagonal
w = 36.00 mm
h = 24.00 mm
h = 24.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 36.00² + 24.00² | = 43.27 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
-1D Mark III sensor area
Width = 28.70 mm
Height = 18.70 mm
Surface area = 28.70 × 18.70 = 536.69 mm²
Height = 18.70 mm
Surface area = 28.70 × 18.70 = 536.69 mm²
-1Ds Mark II sensor area
Width = 36.00 mm
Height = 24.00 mm
Surface area = 36.00 × 24.00 = 864.00 mm²
Height = 24.00 mm
Surface area = 36.00 × 24.00 = 864.00 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
-1D Mark III pixel pitch
Sensor width = 28.70 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3931 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3931 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 28.70 | × 1000 | = 7.3 µm |
| 3931 |
-1Ds Mark II pixel pitch
Sensor width = 36.00 mm
Sensor resolution width = 5006 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 5006 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 36.00 | × 1000 | = 7.19 µm |
| 5006 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
-1D Mark III pixel area
Pixel pitch = 7.3 µm
Pixel area = 7.3² = 53.29 µm²
Pixel area = 7.3² = 53.29 µm²
-1Ds Mark II pixel area
Pixel pitch = 7.19 µm
Pixel area = 7.19² = 51.7 µm²
Pixel area = 7.19² = 51.7 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
-1D Mark III pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3931 pixels
Sensor width = 2.87 cm
Pixel density = (3931 / 2.87)² / 1000000 = 1.88 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.87 cm
Pixel density = (3931 / 2.87)² / 1000000 = 1.88 MP/cm²
-1Ds Mark II pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 5006 pixels
Sensor width = 3.6 cm
Pixel density = (5006 / 3.6)² / 1000000 = 1.93 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 3.6 cm
Pixel density = (5006 / 3.6)² / 1000000 = 1.93 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
-1D Mark III sensor resolution
Sensor width = 28.70 mm
Sensor height = 18.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 10.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2569 × 1.53 = 3931
Resolution vertical: X = 2569
Sensor resolution = 3931 x 2569
Sensor height = 18.70 mm
Effective megapixels = 10.10
| r = 28.70/18.70 = 1.53 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2569
Sensor resolution = 3931 x 2569
-1Ds Mark II sensor resolution
Sensor width = 36.00 mm
Sensor height = 24.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.70
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3337 × 1.5 = 5006
Resolution vertical: X = 3337
Sensor resolution = 5006 x 3337
Sensor height = 24.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.70
| r = 36.00/24.00 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3337
Sensor resolution = 5006 x 3337
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
-1D Mark III crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 34.25 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.26 |
| 34.25 |
-1Ds Mark II crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 43.27 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1 |
| 43.27 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
-1D Mark III equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon -1D Mark III, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Canon -1D Mark III is 1.26
Crop factor for Canon -1D Mark III is 1.26
-1Ds Mark II equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon -1Ds Mark II, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Since crop factor for Canon -1Ds Mark II is 1, the equivalent aperture is aperture.
Since crop factor for Canon -1Ds Mark II is 1, the equivalent aperture is aperture.
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.