Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1D Mark II
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Canon EOS-1D | Canon EOS-1D Mark II | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
4.10
8.20
Max. image resolution
2464 x 1648
3504 x 2336
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CMOS
Sensor size
28.7 x 19.1 mm
28.7 x 19.1 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 1 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Canon EOS-1D | Canon EOS-1D Mark II | |
Surface area:
| 548.17 mm² | vs | 548.17 mm² |
Difference: 0 mm² (0%)
-1D and -1D Mark II sensors are the same size.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 3 year gap between Canon -1D (2001) and Canon -1D Mark II (2004).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 66.95 µm² (100%)
A pixel on Canon -1D sensor is approx. 100% bigger than a pixel on Canon -1D Mark II.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Canon -1D
Canon -1D Mark II
Total megapixels
4.50
8.50
Effective megapixels
4.10
8.20
Optical zoom
Digital zoom
No
No
ISO sensitivity
200 - 1600 in 1/3 stops, plus 100 and 3200 as options
100 - 1600 in 1/3 stops, plus 50 and 3200 as options
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (pentaprism)
Optical (pentaprism)
White balance presets
8
8
Screen size
2"
2"
Screen resolution
120,000 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD card
USB
USB 1.0
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Canon Lithium-Ion
Canon Lithium-Ion
Weight
1585 g
1565 g
Dimensions
156 x 158 x 80 mm
156 x 158 x 80 mm
Year
2001
2004
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1Ds
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 5D
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 1300D
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Nikon D1
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1D Mark II
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 10D
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 6D
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Nikon D1H
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Nikon D100
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Canon -1D diagonal
w = 28.70 mm
h = 19.10 mm
h = 19.10 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 28.70² + 19.10² | = 34.47 mm |
Canon -1D Mark II diagonal
w = 28.70 mm
h = 19.10 mm
h = 19.10 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 28.70² + 19.10² | = 34.47 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
-1D sensor area
Width = 28.70 mm
Height = 19.10 mm
Surface area = 28.70 × 19.10 = 548.17 mm²
Height = 19.10 mm
Surface area = 28.70 × 19.10 = 548.17 mm²
-1D Mark II sensor area
Width = 28.70 mm
Height = 19.10 mm
Surface area = 28.70 × 19.10 = 548.17 mm²
Height = 19.10 mm
Surface area = 28.70 × 19.10 = 548.17 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
-1D pixel pitch
Sensor width = 28.70 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2480 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2480 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 28.70 | × 1000 | = 11.57 µm |
| 2480 |
-1D Mark II pixel pitch
Sensor width = 28.70 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3507 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3507 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 28.70 | × 1000 | = 8.18 µm |
| 3507 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
-1D pixel area
Pixel pitch = 11.57 µm
Pixel area = 11.57² = 133.86 µm²
Pixel area = 11.57² = 133.86 µm²
-1D Mark II pixel area
Pixel pitch = 8.18 µm
Pixel area = 8.18² = 66.91 µm²
Pixel area = 8.18² = 66.91 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
-1D pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2480 pixels
Sensor width = 2.87 cm
Pixel density = (2480 / 2.87)² / 1000000 = 0.75 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.87 cm
Pixel density = (2480 / 2.87)² / 1000000 = 0.75 MP/cm²
-1D Mark II pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3507 pixels
Sensor width = 2.87 cm
Pixel density = (3507 / 2.87)² / 1000000 = 1.49 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.87 cm
Pixel density = (3507 / 2.87)² / 1000000 = 1.49 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
-1D sensor resolution
Sensor width = 28.70 mm
Sensor height = 19.10 mm
Effective megapixels = 4.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1653 × 1.5 = 2480
Resolution vertical: X = 1653
Sensor resolution = 2480 x 1653
Sensor height = 19.10 mm
Effective megapixels = 4.10
| r = 28.70/19.10 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1653
Sensor resolution = 2480 x 1653
-1D Mark II sensor resolution
Sensor width = 28.70 mm
Sensor height = 19.10 mm
Effective megapixels = 8.20
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2338 × 1.5 = 3507
Resolution vertical: X = 2338
Sensor resolution = 3507 x 2338
Sensor height = 19.10 mm
Effective megapixels = 8.20
| r = 28.70/19.10 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2338
Sensor resolution = 3507 x 2338
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
-1D crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 34.47 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.26 |
| 34.47 |
-1D Mark II crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 34.47 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.26 |
| 34.47 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
-1D equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon -1D, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Canon -1D is 1.26
Crop factor for Canon -1D is 1.26
-1D Mark II equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon -1D Mark II, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Canon -1D Mark II is 1.26
Crop factor for Canon -1D Mark II is 1.26
More comparisons of Canon -1D:
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Nikon D200
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Nikon D2Hs
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1D X
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 60D
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 1000D
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS D60
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS Rebel T3
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1D Mark IV
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS-1D Mark III
- Canon EOS-1D vs. Canon EOS 450D
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.