Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Canon EOS 300D
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Canon EOS 300D | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
12.10
6.30
Max. image resolution
4000 x 3000
3072 x 2048
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CMOS
Sensor size
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
22.7 x 15.1 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 12.04 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Canon EOS 300D | |
Surface area:
| 28.46 mm² | vs | 342.77 mm² |
Difference: 314.31 mm² (1104%)
300D sensor is approx. 12.04x bigger than H10 sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of very different generations.
There is a gap of 6 years between Casio H10 (2009) and Canon 300D (2003).
Six years is a lot of time in terms
of technology, meaning newer sensors are overall much more
efficient than the older ones.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 52.09 µm² (2198%)
A pixel on Canon 300D sensor is approx. 2198% bigger than a pixel on Casio H10.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Casio H10
Canon 300D
Total megapixels
12.40
6.34
Effective megapixels
12.10
6.30
Optical zoom
10x
Digital zoom
Yes
No
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 64, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
40 cm
Macro focus range
15 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24 - 240 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f3.2 - f5.7
Metering
Centre weighted, Multi-pattern, Spot
Centre weighted, Matrix, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
4 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
Optical (pentamirror)
White balance presets
7
6
Screen size
3"
1.8"
Screen resolution
230,400 dots
118,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
SDHC, Secure Digital
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-Ion NP-90 rechargeable battery
Canon 1100mAh Li-Ion
Weight
164 g
645 g
Dimensions
102.5 x 62 x 24.3 mm
142 x 99 x 73 mm
Year
2009
2003
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Casio Exilim EX-H15
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Casio Exilim EX-H50
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Casio Exilim EX-H30
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Casio Exilim EX-Z90
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Casio Exilim EX-ZS150
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Olympus FE-280
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W210
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Canon PowerShot A540
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Canon EOS 300D
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS18
- Casio Exilim EX-H10 vs. Nikon Coolpix S9050
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Casio H10 diagonal
The diagonal of H10 sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 6.16² + 4.62² | = 7.70 mm |
Canon 300D diagonal
w = 22.70 mm
h = 15.10 mm
h = 15.10 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 22.70² + 15.10² | = 27.26 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
H10 sensor area
Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
300D sensor area
Width = 22.70 mm
Height = 15.10 mm
Surface area = 22.70 × 15.10 = 342.77 mm²
Height = 15.10 mm
Surface area = 22.70 × 15.10 = 342.77 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
H10 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4011 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4011 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 6.16 | × 1000 | = 1.54 µm |
| 4011 |
300D pixel pitch
Sensor width = 22.70 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3074 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3074 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 22.70 | × 1000 | = 7.38 µm |
| 3074 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
H10 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.54 µm
Pixel area = 1.54² = 2.37 µm²
Pixel area = 1.54² = 2.37 µm²
300D pixel area
Pixel pitch = 7.38 µm
Pixel area = 7.38² = 54.46 µm²
Pixel area = 7.38² = 54.46 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
H10 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4011 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4011 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 42.4 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4011 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 42.4 MP/cm²
300D pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3074 pixels
Sensor width = 2.27 cm
Pixel density = (3074 / 2.27)² / 1000000 = 1.83 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.27 cm
Pixel density = (3074 / 2.27)² / 1000000 = 1.83 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
H10 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3016 × 1.33 = 4011
Resolution vertical: X = 3016
Sensor resolution = 4011 x 3016
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.10
| r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3016
Sensor resolution = 4011 x 3016
300D sensor resolution
Sensor width = 22.70 mm
Sensor height = 15.10 mm
Effective megapixels = 6.30
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2049 × 1.5 = 3074
Resolution vertical: X = 2049
Sensor resolution = 3074 x 2049
Sensor height = 15.10 mm
Effective megapixels = 6.30
| r = 22.70/15.10 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2049
Sensor resolution = 3074 x 2049
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
H10 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.62 |
| 7.70 |
300D crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 27.26 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.59 |
| 27.26 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
H10 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f3.2 - f5.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.2 - f5.7) × 5.62 = f18 - f32
Aperture = f3.2 - f5.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.2 - f5.7) × 5.62 = f18 - f32
300D equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon 300D, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Canon 300D is 1.59
Crop factor for Canon 300D is 1.59
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.