Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Comparison

change cameras »
Exilim Pro EX-F1 image
vs
Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III image
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
check price » check price »
Megapixels
6.00
20.10
Max. image resolution
2816 x 2112
5472 x 3648

Sensor

Sensor type
CCD
CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
13.2 x 8.8 mm
Sensor resolution
2825 x 2124
5492 x 3661
Diagonal
8.89 mm
15.86 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
vs
1 : 3.06
(ratio)
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Surface area:
37.90 mm² vs 116.16 mm²
Difference: 78.26 mm² (206%)
RX10 III sensor is approx. 3.06x bigger than Exilim Pro EX-F1 sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of very different generations. There is a gap of 8 years between Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 (2008) and Sony RX10 III (2016). Eight years is a lot of time in terms of technology, meaning newer sensors are overall much more efficient than the older ones.
Pixel pitch
2.52 µm
2.4 µm
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Difference: 0.12 µm (5%)
Pixel pitch of Exilim Pro EX-F1 is approx. 5% higher than pixel pitch of RX10 III.
Pixel area
6.35 µm²
5.76 µm²
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 0.59 µm² (10%)
A pixel on Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 sensor is approx. 10% bigger than a pixel on Sony RX10 III.
Pixel density
15.79 MP/cm²
17.31 MP/cm²
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Difference: 1.52 µm (10%)
Sony RX10 III has approx. 10% higher pixel density than Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.



Specs

Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
Sony RX10 III
Crop factor
4.87
2.73
Total megapixels
6.60
Effective megapixels
6.00
20.10
Optical zoom
12x
25x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
Auto, 100-12800 (expands to 64-25600)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
40 cm
3 cm
Macro focus range
5 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
36 - 432 mm
24 - 600 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.7 - f4.6
f2.4 - f4.0
Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)
f13.1 - f22.4
f6.6 - f10.9
Metering
Centre weighted, Multi-pattern, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
60 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/40000 sec
1/2000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Electronic
Electronic
White balance presets
5
9
Screen size
2.8"
3"
Screen resolution
230,160 dots
1,228,800 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
3840x2160 (30p/25p/24p)
Storage types
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo/MS PRO Duo
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Casio NP-100 Li Ion battery
NP-FW50 lithium-ion battery
Weight
671 g
1051 g
Dimensions
127.7 x 79.6 x 130.1 mm
132.5 x 94.0 x 127.4 mm
Year
2008
2016




Choose cameras to compare

vs

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
Diagonal =  w² + h²
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 diagonal

The diagonal of Exilim Pro EX-F1 sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
Diagonal =  7.11² + 5.33²   = 8.89 mm

Sony RX10 III diagonal

w = 13.20 mm
h = 8.80 mm
Diagonal =  13.20² + 8.80²   = 15.86 mm


Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

Exilim Pro EX-F1 sensor area

Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm

Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²

RX10 III sensor area

Width = 13.20 mm
Height = 8.80 mm

Surface area = 13.20 × 8.80 = 116.16 mm²


Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =   sensor width in mm  × 1000
sensor resolution width in pixels

Exilim Pro EX-F1 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2825 pixels
Pixel pitch =   7.11  × 1000  = 2.52 µm
2825

RX10 III pixel pitch

Sensor width = 13.20 mm
Sensor resolution width = 5492 pixels
Pixel pitch =   13.20  × 1000  = 2.4 µm
5492


Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =   sensor surface area in mm²
effective megapixels

Exilim Pro EX-F1 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 2.52 µm

Pixel area = 2.52² = 6.35 µm²

RX10 III pixel area

Pixel pitch = 2.4 µm

Pixel area = 2.4² = 5.76 µm²


Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel density =  ( sensor resolution width in pixels )² / 1000000
sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =   effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000
sensor surface area in mm²

Exilim Pro EX-F1 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 2825 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm

Pixel density = (2825 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 15.79 MP/cm²

RX10 III pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 5492 pixels
Sensor width = 1.32 cm

Pixel density = (5492 / 1.32)² / 1000000 = 17.31 MP/cm²


Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000    →   
X =  effective megapixels × 1000000
r
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

Exilim Pro EX-F1 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 6.00
r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33
X =  6.00 × 1000000  = 2124
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2124 × 1.33 = 2825
Resolution vertical: X = 2124

Sensor resolution = 2825 x 2124

RX10 III sensor resolution

Sensor width = 13.20 mm
Sensor height = 8.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 20.10
r = 13.20/8.80 = 1.5
X =  20.10 × 1000000  = 3661
1.5
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3661 × 1.5 = 5492
Resolution vertical: X = 3661

Sensor resolution = 5492 x 3661


Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =   43.27 mm
sensor diagonal in mm


Exilim Pro EX-F1 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 4.87
8.89

RX10 III crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 15.86 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 2.73
15.86

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

Exilim Pro EX-F1 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.7 - f4.6

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.7 - f4.6) × 4.87 = f13.1 - f22.4

RX10 III equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 2.73
Aperture = f2.4 - f4.0

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.4 - f4.0) × 2.73 = f6.6 - f10.9

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.