Concord 3047 vs. Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Concord 3047 | Canon EOS R5 Mark II | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
3.10
45.00
Max. image resolution
2400 x 1800
8192 x 5464
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
1/2" (~ 6.4 x 4.8 mm)
36 x 24 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 28.13 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Concord 3047 | Canon EOS R5 Mark II | |
Surface area:
| 30.72 mm² | vs | 864.00 mm² |
Difference: 833.28 mm² (2713%)
R5 Mark II sensor is approx. 28.13x bigger than 3047 sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of vastly different generations.
There is a gap of 19 years between Concord 3047 (2005) and
Canon R5 Mark II (2024 ).
Nineteen years is a huge amount of time,
technology wise, resulting in newer sensor being much more
efficient than the older one.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 9.26 µm² (93%)
A pixel on Canon R5 Mark II sensor is approx. 93% bigger than a pixel on Concord 3047.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Concord 3047
Canon R5 Mark II
Total megapixels
50.30
Effective megapixels
45.00
Optical zoom
No
Digital zoom
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto
Auto, 100-51200 (extends to 50-102400)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
150 cm
Macro focus range
50 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
44 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8
Metering
Centre weighted
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot, Partial
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
15 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/10000 sec
1/8000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
Electronic
White balance presets
3
8
Screen size
1.5"
3.2"
Screen resolution
61,000 dots
2,100,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
8192x4320 (60/50/30p/25p/24p)
Storage types
Secure Digital
SD/SDHC/SDXC, CFexpress Type B
USB
USB 1.1
USB 3.2 (10 GBit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
2x AAA
LP-E6P lithium-ion battery
Weight
100 g
746 g
Dimensions
89.5 x 25 x 58 mm
138.5 x 101.2 x 93.5 mm
Year
2005
2024
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Concord 3047 vs. Concord 3345z
- Concord 3047 vs. Canon Digital IXUS 330
- Concord 3047 vs. Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D vs. Canon EOS 750D
- Canon EOS 1300D vs. Canon EOS 700D
- Canon EOS 600D vs. Canon EOS 1300D
- Canon EOS 800D vs. Canon EOS 750D
- Canon EOS 1300D vs. Canon EOS 1200D
- Canon EOS 200D vs. Canon EOS 700D
- Canon EOS 1300D vs. Canon EOS 750D
- Canon EOS 4000D vs. Canon EOS 1300D
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Concord 3047 diagonal
The diagonal of 3047 sensor is not 1/2 or 0.5" (12.7 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 6.40² + 4.80² | = 8.00 mm |
Canon R5 Mark II diagonal
w = 36.00 mm
h = 24.00 mm
h = 24.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 36.00² + 24.00² | = 43.27 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
3047 sensor area
Width = 6.40 mm
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
R5 Mark II sensor area
Width = 36.00 mm
Height = 24.00 mm
Surface area = 36.00 × 24.00 = 864.00 mm²
Height = 24.00 mm
Surface area = 36.00 × 24.00 = 864.00 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
3047 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 6.40 | × 1000 | = 3.15 µm |
| 2031 |
R5 Mark II pixel pitch
Sensor width = 36.00 mm
Sensor resolution width = 8216 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 8216 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 36.00 | × 1000 | = 4.38 µm |
| 8216 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
3047 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.15 µm
Pixel area = 3.15² = 9.92 µm²
Pixel area = 3.15² = 9.92 µm²
R5 Mark II pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.38 µm
Pixel area = 4.38² = 19.18 µm²
Pixel area = 4.38² = 19.18 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
3047 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 10.07 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 10.07 MP/cm²
R5 Mark II pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 8216 pixels
Sensor width = 3.6 cm
Pixel density = (8216 / 3.6)² / 1000000 = 5.21 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 3.6 cm
Pixel density = (8216 / 3.6)² / 1000000 = 5.21 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
3047 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1527 × 1.33 = 2031
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
| r = 6.40/4.80 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
R5 Mark II sensor resolution
Sensor width = 36.00 mm
Sensor height = 24.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 45.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 5477 × 1.5 = 8216
Resolution vertical: X = 5477
Sensor resolution = 8216 x 5477
Sensor height = 24.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 45.00
| r = 36.00/24.00 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 5477
Sensor resolution = 8216 x 5477
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
3047 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.00 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.41 |
| 8.00 |
R5 Mark II crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 43.27 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1 |
| 43.27 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
3047 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.41
Aperture = f2.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8) × 5.41 = f15.1
Aperture = f2.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8) × 5.41 = f15.1
R5 Mark II equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon R5 Mark II, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Since crop factor for Canon R5 Mark II is 1, the equivalent aperture is aperture.
Since crop factor for Canon R5 Mark II is 1, the equivalent aperture is aperture.
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.