Concord DVx vs. Concord ES500z

Comparison

change cameras »
DVx image
vs
ES500z image
Concord DVx Concord ES500z
check price » check price »
Megapixels
2.00
5.10
Max. image resolution
2304 x 1728
2560 x 1936

Sensor

Sensor type
CMOS
CCD
Sensor size
1/2" (~ 6.4 x 4.8 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor resolution
1631 x 1226
2604 x 1958
Diagonal
8.00 mm
7.19 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
vs
1.24 : 1
(ratio)
Concord DVx Concord ES500z
Surface area:
30.72 mm² vs 24.84 mm²
Difference: 5.88 mm² (24%)
DVx sensor is approx. 1.24x bigger than ES500z sensor.
Pixel pitch
3.92 µm
2.21 µm
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Difference: 1.71 µm (77%)
Pixel pitch of DVx is approx. 77% higher than pixel pitch of ES500z.
Pixel area
15.37 µm²
4.88 µm²
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 10.49 µm² (215%)
A pixel on Concord DVx sensor is approx. 215% bigger than a pixel on Concord ES500z.
Pixel density
6.49 MP/cm²
20.51 MP/cm²
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Difference: 14.02 µm (216%)
Concord ES500z has approx. 216% higher pixel density than Concord DVx.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.



Specs

Concord DVx
Concord ES500z
Crop factor
5.41
6.02
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
Optical zoom
No
Yes
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
100, 200, 400
Auto, 100, 200, 400
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
80 cm
20 cm
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
40 mm
34 - 98 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f3.5
f2.8 - f4.8
Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)
f18.9
f16.9 - f28.9
Metering
Centre weighted, Evaluative, Spot
Centre weighted
Exposure compensation
±1.5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
1/2 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
1/2000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
Optical
White balance presets
5
5
Screen size
1.5"
2"
Screen resolution
120,480 dots
153,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
MultiMedia, Secure Digital
Secure Digital
USB
USB 1.1
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Li-Ion
2x AA
Weight
185 g
140 g
Dimensions
62 x 16 x 103 mm
100 x 30 x 60 mm
Year
2004
2005




Choose cameras to compare

vs

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
Diagonal =  w² + h²
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Concord DVx diagonal

The diagonal of DVx sensor is not 1/2 or 0.5" (12.7 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 8 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
Diagonal =  6.40² + 4.80²   = 8.00 mm

Concord ES500z diagonal

The diagonal of ES500z sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
Diagonal =  5.75² + 4.32²   = 7.19 mm


Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

DVx sensor area

Width = 6.40 mm
Height = 4.80 mm

Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²

ES500z sensor area

Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm

Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²


Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =   sensor width in mm  × 1000
sensor resolution width in pixels

DVx pixel pitch

Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Pixel pitch =   6.40  × 1000  = 3.92 µm
1631

ES500z pixel pitch

Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2604 pixels
Pixel pitch =   5.75  × 1000  = 2.21 µm
2604


Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =   sensor surface area in mm²
effective megapixels

DVx pixel area

Pixel pitch = 3.92 µm

Pixel area = 3.92² = 15.37 µm²

ES500z pixel area

Pixel pitch = 2.21 µm

Pixel area = 2.21² = 4.88 µm²


Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel density =  ( sensor resolution width in pixels )² / 1000000
sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =   effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000
sensor surface area in mm²

DVx pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Sensor width = 0.64 cm

Pixel density = (1631 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 6.49 MP/cm²

ES500z pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 2604 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm

Pixel density = (2604 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 20.51 MP/cm²


Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000    →   
X =  effective megapixels × 1000000
r
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

DVx sensor resolution

Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.00
r = 6.40/4.80 = 1.33
X =  2.00 × 1000000  = 1226
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1226 × 1.33 = 1631
Resolution vertical: X = 1226

Sensor resolution = 1631 x 1226

ES500z sensor resolution

Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.10
r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33
X =  5.10 × 1000000  = 1958
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1958 × 1.33 = 2604
Resolution vertical: X = 1958

Sensor resolution = 2604 x 1958


Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =   43.27 mm
sensor diagonal in mm


DVx crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.00 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 5.41
8.00

ES500z crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 6.02
7.19

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

DVx equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 5.41
Aperture = f3.5

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.5) × 5.41 = f18.9

ES500z equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f28.9

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.