Contax SL300R T vs. BenQ DC C520
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Contax SL300R T | BenQ DC C520 | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
3.17
5.00
Max. image resolution
2048 x 1536
2560 x 1920
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.7" (~ 5.33 x 4 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 1.17 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Contax SL300R T | BenQ DC C520 | |
Surface area:
| 21.32 mm² | vs | 24.84 mm² |
Difference: 3.52 mm² (17%)
DC C520 sensor is approx. 1.17x bigger than SL300R T sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 2 year gap between Contax SL300R T (2003) and BenQ DC C520 (2005).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 1.74 µm² (35%)
A pixel on Contax SL300R T sensor is approx. 35% bigger than a pixel on BenQ DC C520.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Contax SL300R T
BenQ DC C520
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
Optical zoom
Yes
Yes
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800
Auto, 50, 100, 200
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
60 cm
50 cm
Macro focus range
20 cm
6 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
38 - 115 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.7
f2.8 - f4.8
Metering
Centre weighted, Matrix, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
8 sec
1/2 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/1000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
None
White balance presets
6
Screen size
1.5"
2"
Screen resolution
118,000 dots
130,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
MultiMedia, Secure Digital
USB
USB 1.1
USB 1.1
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Li-Ion
Weight
125 g
130 g
Dimensions
100 x 62 x 16 mm
91 x 61 x 27 mm
Year
2003
2005
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Contax SL300R T vs. Contax U4R
- Contax SL300R T vs. Contax TVS Digital
- Contax SL300R T vs. BenQ DC C520
- Contax SL300R T vs. Contax i4R
- Contax SL300R T vs. Nikon D3300
- Contax SL300R T vs. Nokia 808 PureView
- Contax SL300R T vs. Canon EOS 350D
- Contax SL300R T vs. Olympus OM-D E-M5
- Contax SL300R T vs. Fujifilm X-E1
- Contax SL300R T vs. Nikon D3200
- Contax SL300R T vs. Acer CE-5430
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Contax SL300R T diagonal
The diagonal of SL300R T sensor is not 1/2.7 or 0.37" (9.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 6.66 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.33² + 4.00² | = 6.66 mm |
BenQ DC C520 diagonal
The diagonal of DC C520 sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
SL300R T sensor area
Width = 5.33 mm
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
DC C520 sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
SL300R T pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2054 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2054 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.33 | × 1000 | = 2.59 µm |
| 2054 |
DC C520 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 2.23 µm |
| 2579 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
SL300R T pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.59 µm
Pixel area = 2.59² = 6.71 µm²
Pixel area = 2.59² = 6.71 µm²
DC C520 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.23 µm
Pixel area = 2.23² = 4.97 µm²
Pixel area = 2.23² = 4.97 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
SL300R T pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2054 pixels
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (2054 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 14.85 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (2054 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 14.85 MP/cm²
DC C520 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2579 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 20.12 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2579 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 20.12 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
SL300R T sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.17
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1544 × 1.33 = 2054
Resolution vertical: X = 1544
Sensor resolution = 2054 x 1544
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.17
| r = 5.33/4.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1544
Sensor resolution = 2054 x 1544
DC C520 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1939 × 1.33 = 2579
Resolution vertical: X = 1939
Sensor resolution = 2579 x 1939
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.00
| r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1939
Sensor resolution = 2579 x 1939
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
SL300R T crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.66 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.5 |
| 6.66 |
DC C520 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
| 7.19 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
SL300R T equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.5
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.7) × 6.5 = f18.2 - f30.6
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.7) × 6.5 = f18.2 - f30.6
DC C520 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f28.9
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f28.9
More comparisons of Contax SL300R T:
- Contax SL300R T vs. Nikon D7100
- Contax SL300R T vs. Nikon D700
- Contax SL300R T vs. Pentax 645Z
- Contax SL300R T vs. Canon PowerShot S100
- Contax SL300R T vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
- Contax SL300R T vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
- Contax SL300R T vs. Nikon Df
- Contax SL300R T vs. Canon EOS D60
- Contax SL300R T vs. Fujifilm FinePix S8000fd
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.