HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Yakumo Mega Image 67x
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
HP Photosmart Mz67 | Yakumo Mega Image 67x | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
8.00
5.36
Max. image resolution
3264 x 2448
2816 x 2112
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1 |
(ratio) | ||
HP Photosmart Mz67 | Yakumo Mega Image 67x |
Surface area:
37.90 mm² | vs | 37.90 mm² |
Difference: 0 mm² (0%)
Mz67 and 67x sensors are the same size.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 3 year gap between HP Mz67 (2007) and Yakumo 67x (2004).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 2.33 µm² (49%)
A pixel on Yakumo 67x sensor is approx. 49% bigger than a pixel on HP Mz67.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
HP Mz67
Yakumo 67x
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
Optical zoom
6x
Yes
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto
Auto, 100, 200, 400
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
100 cm
40 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 - 210 mm
37 - 111 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.8
f2.7 - f4.9
Metering
Centre weighted, Matrix, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
2 sec
8 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
1/2000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
Optical
White balance presets
5
5
Screen size
2.5"
1.5"
Screen resolution
61,600 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
Secure Digital
Secure Digital
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 1.1
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
2x AA
Weight
227 g
175 g
Dimensions
99 x 44 x 64 mm
101 x 56 x 38.9 mm
Year
2007
2004
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Yakumo Mega Image 67x
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Vivitar ViviCam X60
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Acer CE-5330
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ5
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. HP CA350
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Minolta DiMAGE F200
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ10
- HP Photosmart Mz67 vs. GE A1255
- Canon EOS 200D vs. Canon EOS 750D
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
HP Mz67 diagonal
The diagonal of Mz67 sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
Diagonal = √ | 7.11² + 5.33² | = 8.89 mm |
Yakumo 67x diagonal
The diagonal of 67x sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
Diagonal = √ | 7.11² + 5.33² | = 8.89 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
Mz67 sensor area
Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
67x sensor area
Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
Mz67 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3262 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3262 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 7.11 | × 1000 | = 2.18 µm |
3262 |
67x pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2671 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2671 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 7.11 | × 1000 | = 2.66 µm |
2671 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
Mz67 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.18 µm
Pixel area = 2.18² = 4.75 µm²
Pixel area = 2.18² = 4.75 µm²
67x pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.66 µm
Pixel area = 2.66² = 7.08 µm²
Pixel area = 2.66² = 7.08 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
Mz67 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3262 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (3262 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 21.05 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (3262 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 21.05 MP/cm²
67x pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2671 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (2671 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 14.11 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (2671 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 14.11 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
Mz67 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 8.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2453 × 1.33 = 3262
Resolution vertical: X = 2453
Sensor resolution = 3262 x 2453
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 8.00
r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2453
Sensor resolution = 3262 x 2453
67x sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.36
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2008 × 1.33 = 2671
Resolution vertical: X = 2008
Sensor resolution = 2671 x 2008
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.36
r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2008
Sensor resolution = 2671 x 2008
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
Mz67 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.87 |
8.89 |
67x crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.87 |
8.89 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
Mz67 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.4
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.4
67x equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.7 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.7 - f4.9) × 4.87 = f13.1 - f23.9
Aperture = f2.7 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.7 - f4.9) × 4.87 = f13.1 - f23.9
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.