Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv vs. Canon EOS 6D Mark II
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv | Canon EOS 6D Mark II | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
3.10
26.20
Max. image resolution
2048 x 1536
6240 x 4160
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
1/2" (~ 6.4 x 4.8 mm)
35.9 x 24 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 28.05 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv | Canon EOS 6D Mark II | |
Surface area:
| 30.72 mm² | vs | 861.60 mm² |
Difference: 830.88 mm² (2705%)
6D Mark II sensor is approx. 28.05x bigger than JD 3.1 exclusiv sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of vastly different generations.
There is a gap of 12 years between Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv (2005) and
Canon 6D Mark II (2017).
Twelve years is a huge amount of time,
technology wise, resulting in newer sensor being much more
efficient than the older one.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 22.91 µm² (231%)
A pixel on Canon 6D Mark II sensor is approx. 231% bigger than a pixel on Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv
Canon 6D Mark II
Total megapixels
27.10
Effective megapixels
26.20
Optical zoom
Yes
Digital zoom
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100, 200, 400
Auto, 100-40000 (expandable to 50-102400)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
60 cm
Macro focus range
15 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
38 - 114 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f5.6
Metering
Matrix, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot, Partial
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
4 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
Optical (pentaprism)
White balance presets
5
6
Screen size
1.5"
3"
Screen resolution
1,040,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
1920x1080 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p)
Storage types
Secure Digital
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 1.1
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
2x AA
LP-E6N lithium-ion battery
Weight
160 g
765 g
Dimensions
101 x 61 x 38 mm
144 x 110.5 x 74.8 mm
Year
2005
2017
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv vs. Jenoptik JD 3.3 AF
- Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv vs. Jenoptik JD 3.1 z3 MPEG 4
- Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv vs. Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv vs. Jenoptik JD 5200 z3
- Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv vs. Jenoptik JD C 1.3 LCD
- Canon EOS 200D vs. Canon EOS 750D
- Canon EOS 1300D vs. Canon EOS 700D
- Canon EOS 600D vs. Canon EOS 1300D
- Canon EOS 800D vs. Canon EOS 750D
- Canon EOS 1300D vs. Canon EOS 1200D
- Canon EOS 200D vs. Canon EOS 700D
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv diagonal
The diagonal of JD 3.1 exclusiv sensor is not 1/2 or 0.5" (12.7 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 6.40² + 4.80² | = 8.00 mm |
Canon 6D Mark II diagonal
w = 35.90 mm
h = 24.00 mm
h = 24.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 35.90² + 24.00² | = 43.18 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
JD 3.1 exclusiv sensor area
Width = 6.40 mm
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
6D Mark II sensor area
Width = 35.90 mm
Height = 24.00 mm
Surface area = 35.90 × 24.00 = 861.60 mm²
Height = 24.00 mm
Surface area = 35.90 × 24.00 = 861.60 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
JD 3.1 exclusiv pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 6.40 | × 1000 | = 3.15 µm |
| 2031 |
6D Mark II pixel pitch
Sensor width = 35.90 mm
Sensor resolution width = 6269 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 6269 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 35.90 | × 1000 | = 5.73 µm |
| 6269 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
JD 3.1 exclusiv pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.15 µm
Pixel area = 3.15² = 9.92 µm²
Pixel area = 3.15² = 9.92 µm²
6D Mark II pixel area
Pixel pitch = 5.73 µm
Pixel area = 5.73² = 32.83 µm²
Pixel area = 5.73² = 32.83 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
JD 3.1 exclusiv pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 10.07 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 10.07 MP/cm²
6D Mark II pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 6269 pixels
Sensor width = 3.59 cm
Pixel density = (6269 / 3.59)² / 1000000 = 3.05 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 3.59 cm
Pixel density = (6269 / 3.59)² / 1000000 = 3.05 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
JD 3.1 exclusiv sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1527 × 1.33 = 2031
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
| r = 6.40/4.80 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
6D Mark II sensor resolution
Sensor width = 35.90 mm
Sensor height = 24.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 26.20
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 4179 × 1.5 = 6269
Resolution vertical: X = 4179
Sensor resolution = 6269 x 4179
Sensor height = 24.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 26.20
| r = 35.90/24.00 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 4179
Sensor resolution = 6269 x 4179
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
JD 3.1 exclusiv crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.00 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.41 |
| 8.00 |
6D Mark II crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 43.18 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1 |
| 43.18 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
JD 3.1 exclusiv equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.41
Aperture = f2.8 - f5.6
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f5.6) × 5.41 = f15.1 - f30.3
Aperture = f2.8 - f5.6
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f5.6) × 5.41 = f15.1 - f30.3
6D Mark II equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon 6D Mark II, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Since crop factor for Canon 6D Mark II is 1, the equivalent aperture is aperture.
Since crop factor for Canon 6D Mark II is 1, the equivalent aperture is aperture.
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.