Kodak DC5000 vs. Sony Mavica FD-92
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Kodak DC5000 | Sony Mavica FD-92 | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
2.00
1.20
Max. image resolution
1760 x 1168
1472 x 1104
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/1.76" (~ 7.27 x 5.46 mm)
1/2.7" (~ 5.33 x 4 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1.86 | : | 1 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Kodak DC5000 | Sony Mavica FD-92 | |
Surface area:
| 39.69 mm² | vs | 21.32 mm² |
Difference: 18.37 mm² (86%)
DC5000 sensor is approx. 1.86x bigger than Mavica FD-92 sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 2.08 µm² (12%)
A pixel on Kodak DC5000 sensor is approx. 12% bigger than a pixel on Sony Mavica FD-92.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Kodak DC5000
Sony Mavica FD-92
Total megapixels
2.30
1.30
Effective megapixels
2.00
1.20
Optical zoom
2x
8x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
100
100
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
25 cm
Macro focus range
25 cm
3 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
30 - 60 mm
41 - 328 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f3 - f3.8
f1.8 - f2.9
Metering
Centre weighted
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/2 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
1/2 sec
2 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/400 sec
1/500 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (tunnel)
None
White balance presets
5
4
Screen size
1.8"
2.5"
Screen resolution
72,000 dots
123,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
CompactFlash type I
Disk 3.5" (2x speed) or MemoryStick (slot)
USB
USB 1.0
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
InfoLithium (NP-F330)
Weight
520 g
660 g
Dimensions
140 x 89 x 83 mm
126 x 125 x 184 mm
Year
2000
2001
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Kodak DC290
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Samsung WB100
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Nikon D100
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Kodak DCS Pro 14n
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Leica V-LUX 30
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Sony Mavica FD-200
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Sony Mavica FD-92
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Kodak PixPro AZ522
- Kodak DC5000 vs. Olympus SP 810 UZ
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Kodak DC5000 diagonal
The diagonal of DC5000 sensor is not 1/1.76 or 0.57" (14.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 9.09 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.27 mm
h = 5.46 mm
w = 7.27 mm
h = 5.46 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 7.27² + 5.46² | = 9.09 mm |
Sony Mavica FD-92 diagonal
The diagonal of Mavica FD-92 sensor is not 1/2.7 or 0.37" (9.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 6.66 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.33² + 4.00² | = 6.66 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
DC5000 sensor area
Width = 7.27 mm
Height = 5.46 mm
Surface area = 7.27 × 5.46 = 39.69 mm²
Height = 5.46 mm
Surface area = 7.27 × 5.46 = 39.69 mm²
Mavica FD-92 sensor area
Width = 5.33 mm
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
DC5000 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.27 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 7.27 | × 1000 | = 4.46 µm |
| 1631 |
Mavica FD-92 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1264 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1264 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.33 | × 1000 | = 4.22 µm |
| 1264 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
DC5000 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.46 µm
Pixel area = 4.46² = 19.89 µm²
Pixel area = 4.46² = 19.89 µm²
Mavica FD-92 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.22 µm
Pixel area = 4.22² = 17.81 µm²
Pixel area = 4.22² = 17.81 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
DC5000 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1631 pixels
Sensor width = 0.727 cm
Pixel density = (1631 / 0.727)² / 1000000 = 5.03 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.727 cm
Pixel density = (1631 / 0.727)² / 1000000 = 5.03 MP/cm²
Mavica FD-92 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1264 pixels
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (1264 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 5.62 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (1264 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 5.62 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
DC5000 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.27 mm
Sensor height = 5.46 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1226 × 1.33 = 1631
Resolution vertical: X = 1226
Sensor resolution = 1631 x 1226
Sensor height = 5.46 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.00
| r = 7.27/5.46 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1226
Sensor resolution = 1631 x 1226
Mavica FD-92 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.20
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 950 × 1.33 = 1264
Resolution vertical: X = 950
Sensor resolution = 1264 x 950
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.20
| r = 5.33/4.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 950
Sensor resolution = 1264 x 950
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
DC5000 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 9.09 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.76 |
| 9.09 |
Mavica FD-92 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.66 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.5 |
| 6.66 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
DC5000 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.76
Aperture = f3 - f3.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3 - f3.8) × 4.76 = f14.3 - f18.1
Aperture = f3 - f3.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3 - f3.8) × 4.76 = f14.3 - f18.1
Mavica FD-92 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.5
Aperture = f1.8 - f2.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f1.8 - f2.9) × 6.5 = f11.7 - f18.9
Aperture = f1.8 - f2.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f1.8 - f2.9) × 6.5 = f11.7 - f18.9
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.