Konica Revio KD-220Z vs. Fujifilm X-S1

Comparison

change cameras »
Revio KD-220Z image
vs
X-S1 image
Konica Revio KD-220Z Fujifilm X-S1
check price » check price »
Megapixels
2.00
12.00
Max. image resolution
1600 x 1200
4000 x 3000

Sensor

Sensor type
CCD
CMOS
Sensor size
1/3.2" (~ 4.5 x 3.37 mm)
2/3" (~ 8.8 x 6.6 mm)
Sensor resolution
1637 x 1222
3995 x 3004
Diagonal
5.62 mm
11.00 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
vs
1 : 3.83
(ratio)
Konica Revio KD-220Z Fujifilm X-S1
Surface area:
15.17 mm² vs 58.08 mm²
Difference: 42.91 mm² (283%)
X-S1 sensor is approx. 3.83x bigger than KD-220Z sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of very different generations. There is a gap of 9 years between Konica KD-220Z (2002) and Fujifilm X-S1 (2011). Nine years is a lot of time in terms of technology, meaning newer sensors are overall much more efficient than the older ones.
Pixel pitch
2.75 µm
2.2 µm
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Difference: 0.55 µm (25%)
Pixel pitch of KD-220Z is approx. 25% higher than pixel pitch of X-S1.
Pixel area
7.56 µm²
4.84 µm²
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 2.72 µm² (56%)
A pixel on Konica KD-220Z sensor is approx. 56% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-S1.
Pixel density
13.23 MP/cm²
20.61 MP/cm²
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Difference: 7.38 µm (56%)
Fujifilm X-S1 has approx. 56% higher pixel density than Konica KD-220Z.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.



Specs

Konica KD-220Z
Fujifilm X-S1
Crop factor
7.7
3.93
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
12.00
Optical zoom
Yes
26x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
100
Auto, 100, 200, 250, 320, 400, 500, 640, 800, 1000, 1250, 1600, 2000, 2500, 3200, (4000, 5000, 6400, 12800 with boost)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
80 cm
30 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
1 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
32 - 97 mm
24 - 624 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f5.6
f2.8 - f5.6
Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)
f21.6 - f43.1
f11 - f22
Metering
Centre weighted
Multi, Average, Spot
Exposure compensation
±1.8 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
1/10 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
Electronic
White balance presets
6
6
Screen size
1.6"
3"
Screen resolution
460,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
1920x1080 (30p)
Storage types
MultiMedia, Secure Digital
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 1.1
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
2x AA
Lithium-Ion NP-95 rechargeable battery
Weight
220 g
920 g
Dimensions
105 x 63 x 42 mm
135 x 107 x 149 mm
Year
2002
2011




Choose cameras to compare

vs

Popular comparisons:

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
Diagonal = √  w² + h²
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Konica KD-220Z diagonal

The diagonal of KD-220Z sensor is not 1/3.2 or 0.31" (7.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 5.62 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 4.50 mm
h = 3.37 mm
Diagonal = √  4.50² + 3.37²   = 5.62 mm

Fujifilm X-S1 diagonal

The diagonal of X-S1 sensor is not 2/3 or 0.67" (16.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 11 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 8.80 mm
h = 6.60 mm
Diagonal = √  8.80² + 6.60²   = 11.00 mm


Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

KD-220Z sensor area

Width = 4.50 mm
Height = 3.37 mm

Surface area = 4.50 × 3.37 = 15.17 mm²

X-S1 sensor area

Width = 8.80 mm
Height = 6.60 mm

Surface area = 8.80 × 6.60 = 58.08 mm²


Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =   sensor width in mm  × 1000
sensor resolution width in pixels

KD-220Z pixel pitch

Sensor width = 4.50 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1637 pixels
Pixel pitch =   4.50  × 1000  = 2.75 µm
1637

X-S1 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 8.80 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3995 pixels
Pixel pitch =   8.80  × 1000  = 2.2 µm
3995


Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =   sensor surface area in mm²
effective megapixels

KD-220Z pixel area

Pixel pitch = 2.75 µm

Pixel area = 2.75² = 7.56 µm²

X-S1 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 2.2 µm

Pixel area = 2.2² = 4.84 µm²


Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel density =  ( sensor resolution width in pixels )² / 1000000
sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =   effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000
sensor surface area in mm²

KD-220Z pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 1637 pixels
Sensor width = 0.45 cm

Pixel density = (1637 / 0.45)² / 1000000 = 13.23 MP/cm²

X-S1 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 3995 pixels
Sensor width = 0.88 cm

Pixel density = (3995 / 0.88)² / 1000000 = 20.61 MP/cm²


Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000    →   
X = √  effective megapixels × 1000000
r
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

KD-220Z sensor resolution

Sensor width = 4.50 mm
Sensor height = 3.37 mm
Effective megapixels = 2.00
r = 4.50/3.37 = 1.34
X = √  2.00 × 1000000  = 1222
1.34
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1222 × 1.34 = 1637
Resolution vertical: X = 1222

Sensor resolution = 1637 x 1222

X-S1 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 8.80 mm
Sensor height = 6.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.00
r = 8.80/6.60 = 1.33
X = √  12.00 × 1000000  = 3004
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3004 × 1.33 = 3995
Resolution vertical: X = 3004

Sensor resolution = 3995 x 3004


Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =   43.27 mm
sensor diagonal in mm


KD-220Z crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 5.62 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 7.7
5.62

X-S1 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 11.00 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 3.93
11.00

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

KD-220Z equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 7.7
Aperture = f2.8 - f5.6

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f5.6) × 7.7 = f21.6 - f43.1

X-S1 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 3.93
Aperture = f2.8 - f5.6

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f5.6) × 3.93 = f11 - f22

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.