Konica Revio KD-310Z vs. Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55

Comparison

change cameras »
Revio KD-310Z image
vs
DIGITAL IXUS 55 image
Konica Revio KD-310Z Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55
check price » check price »
Megapixels
3.20
5.00
Max. image resolution
2048 x 1536
2592 x 1944

Sensor

Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor resolution
2063 x 1551
2579 x 1939
Diagonal
8.89 mm
7.19 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
vs
1.53 : 1
(ratio)
Konica Revio KD-310Z Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55
Surface area:
37.90 mm² vs 24.84 mm²
Difference: 13.06 mm² (53%)
KD-310Z sensor is approx. 1.53x bigger than DIGITAL IXUS 55 sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 3 year gap between Konica KD-310Z (2002) and Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55 (2005). All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch
3.45 µm
2.23 µm
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Difference: 1.22 µm (55%)
Pixel pitch of KD-310Z is approx. 55% higher than pixel pitch of DIGITAL IXUS 55.
Pixel area
11.9 µm²
4.97 µm²
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 6.93 µm² (139%)
A pixel on Konica KD-310Z sensor is approx. 139% bigger than a pixel on Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55.
Pixel density
8.42 MP/cm²
20.12 MP/cm²
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Difference: 11.7 µm (139%)
Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55 has approx. 139% higher pixel density than Konica KD-310Z.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.



Specs

Konica KD-310Z
Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55
Crop factor
4.87
6.02
Total megapixels
5.00
Effective megapixels
5.00
Optical zoom
Yes
3x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100, 200, 400
Auto, 50, 100, 200, 400
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
50 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
3 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
39 - 117 mm
35 - 105 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.9
f2.8 - f4.9
Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)
f13.6 - f23.9
f16.9 - f29.5
Metering
Centre weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±1.5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
1 sec
15 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/1500 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
6
6
Screen size
1.5"
2.5"
Screen resolution
110,000 dots
115,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
Memory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
SD/MMC card
USB
USB 1.1
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Li-Ion
Lithium-Ion NB-4L battery
Weight
198 g
155 g
Dimensions
94 x 56 x 30 mm
86 x 54 x 22 mm
Year
2002
2005




Choose cameras to compare

vs

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
Diagonal =  w² + h²
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Konica KD-310Z diagonal

The diagonal of KD-310Z sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
Diagonal =  7.11² + 5.33²   = 8.89 mm

Canon DIGITAL IXUS 55 diagonal

The diagonal of DIGITAL IXUS 55 sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
Diagonal =  5.75² + 4.32²   = 7.19 mm


Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

KD-310Z sensor area

Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm

Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²

DIGITAL IXUS 55 sensor area

Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm

Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²


Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =   sensor width in mm  × 1000
sensor resolution width in pixels

KD-310Z pixel pitch

Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2063 pixels
Pixel pitch =   7.11  × 1000  = 3.45 µm
2063

DIGITAL IXUS 55 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
Pixel pitch =   5.75  × 1000  = 2.23 µm
2579


Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =   sensor surface area in mm²
effective megapixels

KD-310Z pixel area

Pixel pitch = 3.45 µm

Pixel area = 3.45² = 11.9 µm²

DIGITAL IXUS 55 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 2.23 µm

Pixel area = 2.23² = 4.97 µm²


Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel density =  ( sensor resolution width in pixels )² / 1000000
sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =   effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000
sensor surface area in mm²

KD-310Z pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 2063 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm

Pixel density = (2063 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 8.42 MP/cm²

DIGITAL IXUS 55 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm

Pixel density = (2579 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 20.12 MP/cm²


Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000    →   
X =  effective megapixels × 1000000
r
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

KD-310Z sensor resolution

Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.20
r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33
X =  3.20 × 1000000  = 1551
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1551 × 1.33 = 2063
Resolution vertical: X = 1551

Sensor resolution = 2063 x 1551

DIGITAL IXUS 55 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.00
r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33
X =  5.00 × 1000000  = 1939
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1939 × 1.33 = 2579
Resolution vertical: X = 1939

Sensor resolution = 2579 x 1939


Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =   43.27 mm
sensor diagonal in mm


KD-310Z crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 4.87
8.89

DIGITAL IXUS 55 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 6.02
7.19

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

KD-310Z equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.9

DIGITAL IXUS 55 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f29.5

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.