Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Casio QV-2000UX
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Konica Revio KD-3300Z | Casio QV-2000UX | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
3.10
1.90
Max. image resolution
2048 x 1536
1600 x 1200
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
1/2" (~ 6.4 x 4.8 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 1.24 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Konica Revio KD-3300Z | Casio QV-2000UX | |
Surface area:
| 24.84 mm² | vs | 30.72 mm² |
Difference: 5.88 mm² (24%)
QV-2000UX sensor is approx. 1.24x bigger than KD-3300Z sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 5 year gap between Konica KD-3300Z (2004) and Casio QV-2000UX (1999).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 8.23 µm² (103%)
A pixel on Casio QV-2000UX sensor is approx. 103% bigger than a pixel on Konica KD-3300Z.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Konica KD-3300Z
Casio QV-2000UX
Total megapixels
2.10
Effective megapixels
1.90
Optical zoom
Yes
3x
Digital zoom
Yes
ISO sensitivity
100
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
50 cm
Macro focus range
15 cm
20 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
34 - 102 mm
36 - 108 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.9
f2.0 - f2.8
Metering
Centre weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/2 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
1/4 sec
1 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/800 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
5
4
Screen size
1.5"
1.8"
Screen resolution
61,380 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
MultiMedia, Secure Digital
Compact Flash
USB
USB 1.1
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
1x CR-V3, 2x AA
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Weight
200 g
320 g
Dimensions
97 x 64 x 36 mm
130 x 75 x 60 mm
Year
2004
1999
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Konica Revio KD-300Z
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Canon PowerShot S100
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Fujifilm FinePix F31fd
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Kyocera Finecam S3
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Nikon Coolpix 8800
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Casio QV-2000UX
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Fujifilm FinePix S1800
- Konica Revio KD-3300Z vs. Konica-Minolta DiMAGE G600
- Canon EOS 200D vs. Canon EOS 750D
- Canon EOS 1300D vs. Canon EOS 700D
- Canon EOS 600D vs. Canon EOS 1300D
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Konica KD-3300Z diagonal
The diagonal of KD-3300Z sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Casio QV-2000UX diagonal
The diagonal of QV-2000UX sensor is not 1/2 or 0.5" (12.7 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 6.40² + 4.80² | = 8.00 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
KD-3300Z sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
QV-2000UX sensor area
Width = 6.40 mm
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
KD-3300Z pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 2.83 µm |
| 2031 |
QV-2000UX pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 6.40 | × 1000 | = 4.03 µm |
| 1589 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
KD-3300Z pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.83 µm
Pixel area = 2.83² = 8.01 µm²
Pixel area = 2.83² = 8.01 µm²
QV-2000UX pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.03 µm
Pixel area = 4.03² = 16.24 µm²
Pixel area = 4.03² = 16.24 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
KD-3300Z pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 12.48 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 12.48 MP/cm²
QV-2000UX pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (1589 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 6.16 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (1589 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 6.16 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
KD-3300Z sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1527 × 1.33 = 2031
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
| r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
QV-2000UX sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.90
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1195 × 1.33 = 1589
Resolution vertical: X = 1195
Sensor resolution = 1589 x 1195
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.90
| r = 6.40/4.80 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1195
Sensor resolution = 1589 x 1195
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
KD-3300Z crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
| 7.19 |
QV-2000UX crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.00 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.41 |
| 8.00 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
KD-3300Z equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f29.5
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f29.5
QV-2000UX equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.41
Aperture = f2.0 - f2.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.0 - f2.8) × 5.41 = f10.8 - f15.1
Aperture = f2.0 - f2.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.0 - f2.8) × 5.41 = f10.8 - f15.1
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.