Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X100V
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Leica M-E (Typ 240) | Fujifilm X100V | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
24.00
26.10
Max. image resolution
5976 x 3992
6240 x 4160
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.8 x 23.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
2.33 | : | 1 |
(ratio) | ||
Leica M-E (Typ 240) | Fujifilm X100V |
Surface area:
855.62 mm² | vs | 366.60 mm² |
Difference: 489.02 mm² (133%)
M-E (Typ 240) sensor is approx. 2.33x bigger than X100V sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 21.65 µm² (155%)
A pixel on Leica M-E (Typ 240) sensor is approx. 155% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X100V.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Leica M-E (Typ 240)
Fujifilm X100V
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
24.00
26.10
Optical zoom
1x
Digital zoom
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 200 - 6400
Auto, 160-12800 (expandable to 80-51200)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
80 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.0
Metering
Center-weighted
Multi, Center-weighted, Average, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
8 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/32000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (rangefinder)
Electronic and Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
7
7
Screen size
3"
3"
Screen resolution
921,600 dots
1,620,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
1920×1080 (25p/24p)
4096x2160 (30p/25p/24p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-ion battery
NP-W126S lithium-ion battery
Weight
680 g
478 g
Dimensions
138.6 x 42 x 80 mm
128 x 74.8 x 53.3 mm
Year
2019
2020
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M-P
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M10 (Typ 3656)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M (Typ 262)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M Typ 240
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica Q2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X-Pro3
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Sony Alpha A7 III
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X100V
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M-E Typ 220
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica SL (Typ 601)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica CL
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Leica M-E (Typ 240) diagonal
w = 35.80 mm
h = 23.90 mm
h = 23.90 mm
Diagonal = √ | 35.80² + 23.90² | = 43.04 mm |
Fujifilm X100V diagonal
w = 23.50 mm
h = 15.60 mm
h = 15.60 mm
Diagonal = √ | 23.50² + 15.60² | = 28.21 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
M-E (Typ 240) sensor area
Width = 35.80 mm
Height = 23.90 mm
Surface area = 35.80 × 23.90 = 855.62 mm²
Height = 23.90 mm
Surface area = 35.80 × 23.90 = 855.62 mm²
X100V sensor area
Width = 23.50 mm
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.60 = 366.60 mm²
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.60 = 366.60 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
M-E (Typ 240) pixel pitch
Sensor width = 35.80 mm
Sensor resolution width = 6000 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 6000 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 35.80 | × 1000 | = 5.97 µm |
6000 |
X100V pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor resolution width = 6277 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 6277 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 23.50 | × 1000 | = 3.74 µm |
6277 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
M-E (Typ 240) pixel area
Pixel pitch = 5.97 µm
Pixel area = 5.97² = 35.64 µm²
Pixel area = 5.97² = 35.64 µm²
X100V pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.74 µm
Pixel area = 3.74² = 13.99 µm²
Pixel area = 3.74² = 13.99 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
M-E (Typ 240) pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 6000 pixels
Sensor width = 3.58 cm
Pixel density = (6000 / 3.58)² / 1000000 = 2.81 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 3.58 cm
Pixel density = (6000 / 3.58)² / 1000000 = 2.81 MP/cm²
X100V pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 6277 pixels
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (6277 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 7.13 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (6277 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 7.13 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
M-E (Typ 240) sensor resolution
Sensor width = 35.80 mm
Sensor height = 23.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 4000 × 1.5 = 6000
Resolution vertical: X = 4000
Sensor resolution = 6000 x 4000
Sensor height = 23.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.00
r = 35.80/23.90 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 4000
Sensor resolution = 6000 x 4000
X100V sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 26.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 4157 × 1.51 = 6277
Resolution vertical: X = 4157
Sensor resolution = 6277 x 4157
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 26.10
r = 23.50/15.60 = 1.51 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 4157
Sensor resolution = 6277 x 4157
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
M-E (Typ 240) crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 43.04 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.01 |
43.04 |
X100V crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.21 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.53 |
28.21 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
M-E (Typ 240) equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Leica M-E (Typ 240), take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Leica M-E (Typ 240) is 1.01
Crop factor for Leica M-E (Typ 240) is 1.01
X100V equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 1.53
Aperture = f2.0
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.0) × 1.53 = f3.1
Aperture = f2.0
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.0) × 1.53 = f3.1
More comparisons of Leica M-E (Typ 240):
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Sony Alpha 7 II
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica M8.2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica SL2-S
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Nikon D700
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica Q (Typ 116)
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Leica SL2
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Sony Alpha a7R III
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Ricoh GR III
- Leica M-E (Typ 240) vs. Fujifilm X-T3
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.