Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Canon EOS 2000D
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Canon EOS 2000D | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
16.00
24.10
Max. image resolution
4608 x 3456
6000 x 4000
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
22.3 x 14.9 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 11.67 |
(ratio) | ||
Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Canon EOS 2000D |
Surface area:
28.46 mm² | vs | 332.27 mm² |
Difference: 303.81 mm² (1067%)
2000D sensor is approx. 11.67x bigger than A1000 sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 11.96 µm² (664%)
A pixel on Canon 2000D sensor is approx. 664% bigger than a pixel on Nikon A1000.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Nikon A1000
Canon 2000D
Total megapixels
16.79
24.70
Effective megapixels
16.00
24.10
Optical zoom
35x
Digital zoom
Yes
No
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100-6400
Auto, 100-6400 (extends to 12800)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
Macro focus range
1 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24 - 840 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
f3.4 - f6.9
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Partial
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
8 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Electronic
Optical (pentamirror)
White balance presets
5
6
Screen size
3"
3"
Screen resolution
1,036,000 dots
921,600 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
3840x2160 (30p/25p)
1920x1080 (30p/25p/24p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery
Lithium-Ion LP-E10 rechargeable battery
Weight
330 g
475 g
Dimensions
114.2 x 71.7 x 40.5 mm
129 x 101.3 x 77.6 mm
Year
2019
2018
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ90
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Canon PowerShot SX740 HS
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Nikon Coolpix A900
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ200
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX60
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Nikon A1000 diagonal
The diagonal of A1000 sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
Diagonal = √ | 6.16² + 4.62² | = 7.70 mm |
Canon 2000D diagonal
w = 22.30 mm
h = 14.90 mm
h = 14.90 mm
Diagonal = √ | 22.30² + 14.90² | = 26.82 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
A1000 sensor area
Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
2000D sensor area
Width = 22.30 mm
Height = 14.90 mm
Surface area = 22.30 × 14.90 = 332.27 mm²
Height = 14.90 mm
Surface area = 22.30 × 14.90 = 332.27 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
A1000 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4612 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4612 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 6.16 | × 1000 | = 1.34 µm |
4612 |
2000D pixel pitch
Sensor width = 22.30 mm
Sensor resolution width = 6012 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 6012 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 22.30 | × 1000 | = 3.71 µm |
6012 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
A1000 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.34 µm
Pixel area = 1.34² = 1.8 µm²
Pixel area = 1.34² = 1.8 µm²
2000D pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.71 µm
Pixel area = 3.71² = 13.76 µm²
Pixel area = 3.71² = 13.76 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
A1000 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4612 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4612 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 56.06 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (4612 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 56.06 MP/cm²
2000D pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 6012 pixels
Sensor width = 2.23 cm
Pixel density = (6012 / 2.23)² / 1000000 = 7.27 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.23 cm
Pixel density = (6012 / 2.23)² / 1000000 = 7.27 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
A1000 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3468 × 1.33 = 4612
Resolution vertical: X = 3468
Sensor resolution = 4612 x 3468
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.00
r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3468
Sensor resolution = 4612 x 3468
2000D sensor resolution
Sensor width = 22.30 mm
Sensor height = 14.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 4008 × 1.5 = 6012
Resolution vertical: X = 4008
Sensor resolution = 6012 x 4008
Sensor height = 14.90 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.10
r = 22.30/14.90 = 1.5 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 4008
Sensor resolution = 6012 x 4008
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
A1000 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.62 |
7.70 |
2000D crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 26.82 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 1.61 |
26.82 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
A1000 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f3.4 - f6.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.4 - f6.9) × 5.62 = f19.1 - f38.8
Aperture = f3.4 - f6.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.4 - f6.9) × 5.62 = f19.1 - f38.8
2000D equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Canon 2000D, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Canon 2000D is 1.61
Crop factor for Canon 2000D is 1.61
More comparisons of Nikon A1000:
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Canon PowerShot SX730 HS
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ95
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Nikon Coolpix B500
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Nikon Coolpix P7100
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Nikon Coolpix W300
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Alpha a6000
- Nikon Coolpix A1000 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX95
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.