Olympus SP 310 vs. Kodak EasyShare Z650
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Olympus SP 310 | Kodak EasyShare Z650 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
7.41
6.10
Max. image resolution
3072 x 2304
2832 x 2128
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1.53 | : | 1 |
(ratio) | ||
Olympus SP 310 | Kodak EasyShare Z650 |
Surface area:
37.90 mm² | vs | 24.84 mm² |
Difference: 13.06 mm² (53%)
SP 310 sensor is approx. 1.53x bigger than Z650 sensor.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 1.07 µm² (26%)
A pixel on Olympus SP 310 sensor is approx. 26% bigger than a pixel on Kodak Z650.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Olympus SP 310
Kodak Z650
Total megapixels
6.30
Effective megapixels
6.10
Optical zoom
Yes
10x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 64, 100, 200, 400
Auto, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
20 cm
60 cm
Macro focus range
2 cm
12 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
38 - 114 mm
38 - 380 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.9
f2.8 - f3.7
Metering
Centre weighted, ESP Digital, Spot
Centre weighted, Multi-pattern, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
15 sec
8 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/1700 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical
Electronic
White balance presets
7
5
Screen size
2.5"
2"
Screen resolution
115,000 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
xD Picture card
MultiMedia, Secure Digital
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
1x CR-V3, 2x AA
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Weight
180 g
287 g
Dimensions
99.5 x 65 x 35 mm
98 x 78 x 73 mm
Year
2005
2006
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus SP 350
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus SP 320
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus SP 500 UZ
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus FE-120
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Kodak EasyShare Z650
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Kodak EasyShare Z710
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus C-750 UZ
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Kodak EasyShare Z740
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus mju mini Digital
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Canon PowerShot A610
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus FE-110
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Olympus SP 310 diagonal
The diagonal of SP 310 sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
Diagonal = √ | 7.11² + 5.33² | = 8.89 mm |
Kodak Z650 diagonal
The diagonal of Z650 sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
SP 310 sensor area
Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Z650 sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
SP 310 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3139 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3139 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 7.11 | × 1000 | = 2.27 µm |
3139 |
Z650 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2849 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2849 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 2.02 µm |
2849 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
SP 310 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.27 µm
Pixel area = 2.27² = 5.15 µm²
Pixel area = 2.27² = 5.15 µm²
Z650 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.02 µm
Pixel area = 2.02² = 4.08 µm²
Pixel area = 2.02² = 4.08 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
SP 310 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3139 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (3139 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 19.49 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (3139 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 19.49 MP/cm²
Z650 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2849 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2849 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 24.55 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (2849 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 24.55 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
SP 310 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 7.41
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2360 × 1.33 = 3139
Resolution vertical: X = 2360
Sensor resolution = 3139 x 2360
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 7.41
r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2360
Sensor resolution = 3139 x 2360
Z650 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 6.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2142 × 1.33 = 2849
Resolution vertical: X = 2142
Sensor resolution = 2849 x 2142
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 6.10
r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2142
Sensor resolution = 2849 x 2142
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
SP 310 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.87 |
8.89 |
Z650 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
7.19 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
SP 310 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.9
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.9
Z650 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f22.3
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.7
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.7) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f22.3
More comparisons of Olympus SP 310:
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Samsung WB5500
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus D-580 Zoom
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus SP-620 UZ
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Canon IXUS 175
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus D-510 Zoom
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Fujifilm FinePix S8200
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus C-180
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus C-450 Zoom
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Olympus C-960 Zoom
- Olympus SP 310 vs. Canon IXUS 155
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.