Pentax EI-200 vs. Pentax Optio 230
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Pentax EI-200 | Pentax Optio 230 | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
1.90
1.90
Max. image resolution
1600 x 1200
1600 x 1210
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.7" (~ 5.33 x 4 mm)
1/2.7" (~ 5.33 x 4 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1 | : | 1 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Pentax EI-200 | Pentax Optio 230 | |
Surface area:
| 21.32 mm² | vs | 21.32 mm² |
Difference: 0 mm² (0%)
EI-200 and 230 sensors are the same size.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 2 year gap between Pentax EI-200 (2000) and Pentax 230 (2002).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 0 µm² (0%)
Pentax EI-200 and Pentax 230 have the same pixel area.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Pentax EI-200
Pentax 230
Total megapixels
2.10
2.20
Effective megapixels
1.90
1.90
Optical zoom
3.2x
3x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
100, 200
Auto, (100, 200)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
50 cm
40 cm
Macro focus range
10 cm
10 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
34 - 108 mm
38 - 114 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
No
Max. aperture
f2.4 - f4.0
f2.6 - f5
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Centre weighted, Matrix, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/2 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
No
Min. shutter speed
4 sec
4 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
1/1500 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (tunnel)
Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
5
6
Screen size
2"
1.6"
Screen resolution
84,000 dots
84,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
Compact Flash
CompactFlash type I
USB
USB 1.0
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Weight
390 g
230 g
Dimensions
128 x 72 x 57 mm
104 x 63 x 42 mm
Year
2000
2002
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Konica-Minolta DiMAGE E500
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Pentax EI-2000
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Canon EOS 7D
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Olympus Stylus 720 SW
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Konica-Minolta DiMAGE G600
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Olympus C-720 UZ
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Olympus SP-720UZ
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Pentax Optio 230
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Sanyo DSC S1
- Pentax EI-200 vs. Nikon D3200
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Pentax EI-200 diagonal
The diagonal of EI-200 sensor is not 1/2.7 or 0.37" (9.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 6.66 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.33² + 4.00² | = 6.66 mm |
Pentax 230 diagonal
The diagonal of 230 sensor is not 1/2.7 or 0.37" (9.4 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 6.66 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
w = 5.33 mm
h = 4.00 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.33² + 4.00² | = 6.66 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
EI-200 sensor area
Width = 5.33 mm
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
230 sensor area
Width = 5.33 mm
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Height = 4.00 mm
Surface area = 5.33 × 4.00 = 21.32 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
EI-200 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.33 | × 1000 | = 3.35 µm |
| 1589 |
230 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.33 | × 1000 | = 3.35 µm |
| 1589 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
EI-200 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.35 µm
Pixel area = 3.35² = 11.22 µm²
Pixel area = 3.35² = 11.22 µm²
230 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.35 µm
Pixel area = 3.35² = 11.22 µm²
Pixel area = 3.35² = 11.22 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
EI-200 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (1589 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 8.89 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (1589 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 8.89 MP/cm²
230 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1589 pixels
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (1589 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 8.89 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.533 cm
Pixel density = (1589 / 0.533)² / 1000000 = 8.89 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
EI-200 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.90
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1195 × 1.33 = 1589
Resolution vertical: X = 1195
Sensor resolution = 1589 x 1195
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.90
| r = 5.33/4.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1195
Sensor resolution = 1589 x 1195
230 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.33 mm
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.90
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1195 × 1.33 = 1589
Resolution vertical: X = 1195
Sensor resolution = 1589 x 1195
Sensor height = 4.00 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.90
| r = 5.33/4.00 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1195
Sensor resolution = 1589 x 1195
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
EI-200 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.66 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.5 |
| 6.66 |
230 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.66 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.5 |
| 6.66 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
EI-200 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.5
Aperture = f2.4 - f4.0
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.4 - f4.0) × 6.5 = f15.6 - f26
Aperture = f2.4 - f4.0
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.4 - f4.0) × 6.5 = f15.6 - f26
230 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.5
Aperture = f2.6 - f5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.6 - f5) × 6.5 = f16.9 - f32.5
Aperture = f2.6 - f5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.6 - f5) × 6.5 = f16.9 - f32.5
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.