Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Pentax MX-1
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Pentax Optio 330RS | Pentax MX-1 | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
3.10
12.00
Max. image resolution
2048 x 1536
4000 x 3000
Sensor
Sensor type
CCD
CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.8" (~ 7.11 x 5.33 mm)
1/1.7" (~ 7.53 x 5.64 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1.12 |
(ratio) | ||
Pentax Optio 330RS | Pentax MX-1 |
Surface area:
37.90 mm² | vs | 42.47 mm² |
Difference: 4.57 mm² (12%)
MX-1 sensor is approx. 1.12x bigger than 330RS sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of vastly different generations.
There is a gap of 11 years between Pentax 330RS (2002) and
Pentax MX-1 (2013).
Eleven years is a huge amount of time,
technology wise, resulting in newer sensor being much more
efficient than the older one.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 8.72 µm² (247%)
A pixel on Pentax 330RS sensor is approx. 247% bigger than a pixel on Pentax MX-1.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Pentax 330RS
Pentax MX-1
Total megapixels
3.30
12.76
Effective megapixels
3.10
12.00
Optical zoom
3x
4x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, (125, 250)
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
40 cm
60 cm
Macro focus range
14 cm
1 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
37 - 111 mm
28 - 112 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f4.8
f1.8 - f2.5
Metering
Centre weighted, Matrix, Spot
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
4 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Optical (tunnel)
None
White balance presets
7
9
Screen size
1.6"
3"
Screen resolution
84,000 dots
920,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
CompactFlash type I
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 1.0
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Lithium-Ion rechargeable
Lithium-Ion D-Li-106 rechargeable battery
Weight
235 g
391 g
Dimensions
92 x 59 x 32 mm
122 x 61 x 51 mm
Year
2002
2013
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Canon PowerShot G1
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Pentax Optio 330
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Pentax MX-1
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Samsung NV8
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Canon EOS 60D
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Kyocera Finecam S3
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Leica D-LUX 2
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Leica D-LUX
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Leica D-LUX 3
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Leica D-Lux 6
- Pentax Optio 330RS vs. Canon Digital IXUS 85 IS
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Pentax 330RS diagonal
The diagonal of 330RS sensor is not 1/1.8 or 0.56" (14.1 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8.89 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
w = 7.11 mm
h = 5.33 mm
Diagonal = √ | 7.11² + 5.33² | = 8.89 mm |
Pentax MX-1 diagonal
The diagonal of MX-1 sensor is not 1/1.7 or 0.59" (14.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 9.41 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 7.53 mm
h = 5.64 mm
w = 7.53 mm
h = 5.64 mm
Diagonal = √ | 7.53² + 5.64² | = 9.41 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
330RS sensor area
Width = 7.11 mm
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
Height = 5.33 mm
Surface area = 7.11 × 5.33 = 37.90 mm²
MX-1 sensor area
Width = 7.53 mm
Height = 5.64 mm
Surface area = 7.53 × 5.64 = 42.47 mm²
Height = 5.64 mm
Surface area = 7.53 × 5.64 = 42.47 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
330RS pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 7.11 | × 1000 | = 3.5 µm |
2031 |
MX-1 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 7.53 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4011 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 4011 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 7.53 | × 1000 | = 1.88 µm |
4011 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
330RS pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.5 µm
Pixel area = 3.5² = 12.25 µm²
Pixel area = 3.5² = 12.25 µm²
MX-1 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.88 µm
Pixel area = 1.88² = 3.53 µm²
Pixel area = 1.88² = 3.53 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
330RS pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2031 pixels
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 8.16 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.711 cm
Pixel density = (2031 / 0.711)² / 1000000 = 8.16 MP/cm²
MX-1 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 4011 pixels
Sensor width = 0.753 cm
Pixel density = (4011 / 0.753)² / 1000000 = 28.37 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.753 cm
Pixel density = (4011 / 0.753)² / 1000000 = 28.37 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
330RS sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.11 mm
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1527 × 1.33 = 2031
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
Sensor height = 5.33 mm
Effective megapixels = 3.10
r = 7.11/5.33 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1527
Sensor resolution = 2031 x 1527
MX-1 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 7.53 mm
Sensor height = 5.64 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2993 × 1.34 = 4011
Resolution vertical: X = 2993
Sensor resolution = 4011 x 2993
Sensor height = 5.64 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.00
r = 7.53/5.64 = 1.34 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2993
Sensor resolution = 4011 x 2993
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
330RS crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.89 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.87 |
8.89 |
MX-1 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 9.41 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 4.6 |
9.41 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
330RS equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.87
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.4
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.8) × 4.87 = f13.6 - f23.4
MX-1 equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 4.6
Aperture = f1.8 - f2.5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f1.8 - f2.5) × 4.6 = f8.3 - f11.5
Aperture = f1.8 - f2.5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f1.8 - f2.5) × 4.6 = f8.3 - f11.5
More comparisons of Pentax 330RS:
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.