Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Fujifilm DS-260HD
Comparison
change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD | Fujifilm DS-260HD | ||||
check price » | check price » |
Megapixels
12.00
1.30
Max. image resolution
4000 x 3000
1280 x 1024
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.33" (~ 6.08 x 4.56 mm)
1/2" (~ 6.4 x 4.8 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
vs |
|
1 | : | 1.11 |
(ratio) | ||
Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD | Fujifilm DS-260HD |
Surface area:
27.72 mm² | vs | 30.72 mm² |
Difference: 3 mm² (11%)
DS-260HD sensor is approx. 1.11x bigger than Powerflex 700 Full HD sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of vastly different generations.
There is a gap of 13 years between Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD (2012) and
Fujifilm DS-260HD (1999).
Thirteen years is a huge amount of time,
technology wise, resulting in newer sensor being much more
efficient than the older one.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 21.41 µm² (927%)
A pixel on Fujifilm DS-260HD sensor is approx. 927% bigger than a pixel on Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD
Fujifilm DS-260HD
Total megapixels
1.50
Effective megapixels
12.00
1.30
Optical zoom
8x
3x
Digital zoom
Yes
No
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800,1600, 3200, 6400
100
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
90 cm
Macro focus range
2 cm
25 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24.8 - 198 mm
35 - 105 mm
Aperture priority
Yes
Max. aperture
f3.3 - f5.9
f2.8 - f4.5
Metering
Multi, Average, Spot
Exposure compensation
±3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Min. shutter speed
1/4 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1000 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
6
Screen size
3"
1.8"
Screen resolution
460,000 dots
200,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC
SmartMedia
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 1.0
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
Rechargeable lithium-ion battery
Lithium-Ion (NP-100)
Weight
127 g
700 g
Dimensions
98.8 x 57.1 x 21.9 mm
100 x 145 x 107 mm
Year
2012
1999
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Rollei Flexline 250
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Fujifilm DS-260HD
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Olympus FE-210
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Olympus VG-170
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Rollei Powerflex 610 HD
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Nikon Coolpix L610
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Rollei Sportsline 90
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Rollei Powerflex 470
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Casio Exilim EX-FC100
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD diagonal
The diagonal of Powerflex 700 Full HD sensor is not 1/2.33 or 0.43" (10.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.6 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.08 mm
h = 4.56 mm
w = 6.08 mm
h = 4.56 mm
Diagonal = √ | 6.08² + 4.56² | = 7.60 mm |
Fujifilm DS-260HD diagonal
The diagonal of DS-260HD sensor is not 1/2 or 0.5" (12.7 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 8 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
w = 6.40 mm
h = 4.80 mm
Diagonal = √ | 6.40² + 4.80² | = 8.00 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
Powerflex 700 Full HD sensor area
Width = 6.08 mm
Height = 4.56 mm
Surface area = 6.08 × 4.56 = 27.72 mm²
Height = 4.56 mm
Surface area = 6.08 × 4.56 = 27.72 mm²
DS-260HD sensor area
Width = 6.40 mm
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
Height = 4.80 mm
Surface area = 6.40 × 4.80 = 30.72 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
sensor resolution width in pixels |
Powerflex 700 Full HD pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3995 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3995 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 6.08 | × 1000 | = 1.52 µm |
3995 |
DS-260HD pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1315 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 1315 pixels
Pixel pitch = | 6.40 | × 1000 | = 4.87 µm |
1315 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
effective megapixels |
Powerflex 700 Full HD pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.52 µm
Pixel area = 1.52² = 2.31 µm²
Pixel area = 1.52² = 2.31 µm²
DS-260HD pixel area
Pixel pitch = 4.87 µm
Pixel area = 4.87² = 23.72 µm²
Pixel area = 4.87² = 23.72 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
sensor surface area in mm² |
Powerflex 700 Full HD pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3995 pixels
Sensor width = 0.608 cm
Pixel density = (3995 / 0.608)² / 1000000 = 43.17 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.608 cm
Pixel density = (3995 / 0.608)² / 1000000 = 43.17 MP/cm²
DS-260HD pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 1315 pixels
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (1315 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 4.22 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.64 cm
Pixel density = (1315 / 0.64)² / 1000000 = 4.22 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
Powerflex 700 Full HD sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor height = 4.56 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3004 × 1.33 = 3995
Resolution vertical: X = 3004
Sensor resolution = 3995 x 3004
Sensor height = 4.56 mm
Effective megapixels = 12.00
r = 6.08/4.56 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 3004
Sensor resolution = 3995 x 3004
DS-260HD sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.40 mm
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.30
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 989 × 1.33 = 1315
Resolution vertical: X = 989
Sensor resolution = 1315 x 989
Sensor height = 4.80 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.30
r = 6.40/4.80 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 989
Sensor resolution = 1315 x 989
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
sensor diagonal in mm |
Powerflex 700 Full HD crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.60 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.69 |
7.60 |
DS-260HD crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 8.00 mm
Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.41 |
8.00 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
Powerflex 700 Full HD equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.69
Aperture = f3.3 - f5.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.3 - f5.9) × 5.69 = f18.8 - f33.6
Aperture = f3.3 - f5.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.3 - f5.9) × 5.69 = f18.8 - f33.6
DS-260HD equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.41
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.5) × 5.41 = f15.1 - f24.3
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.5
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.5) × 5.41 = f15.1 - f24.3
More comparisons of Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD:
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Fujifilm FinePix JX300
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Canon Digital IXUS 200 IS
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX60
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Samsung WB200F
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Olympus SH-21
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Nikon Coolpix L25
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Casio Exilim EX-ZR400
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Fujifilm FinePix JX520
- Rollei Powerflex 700 Full HD vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.