Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS
Comparison
| change cameras » | |||||
|
vs |
|
|||
| Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage | Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS | ||||
| check price » | check price » | ||||
Megapixels
5.00
8.00
Max. image resolution
2592 x 1944
3264 x 2448
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CCD
Sensor size
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
1/2.5" (~ 5.75 x 4.32 mm)
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
|
|
vs |
|
| 1.15 | : | 1 |
| (ratio) | ||
| Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage | Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS | |
Surface area:
| 28.46 mm² | vs | 24.84 mm² |
Difference: 3.62 mm² (15%)
Sportsline 60 Camouflage sensor is approx. 1.15x bigger than IXUS 80 IS sensor.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 3 year gap between Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage (2011) and Canon IXUS 80 IS (2008).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 2.61 µm² (84%)
A pixel on Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage sensor is approx. 84% bigger than a pixel on Canon IXUS 80 IS.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage
Canon IXUS 80 IS
Total megapixels
8.30
Effective megapixels
8.00
Optical zoom
No
3x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto
Auto, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
80 cm
30 cm
Macro focus range
3 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
other mm
38 - 114 mm
Aperture priority
No
No
Max. aperture
f2.8
f2.8 - f4.9
Metering
Centre weighted
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
No
Min. shutter speed
15 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/1500 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
Optical (tunnel)
White balance presets
5
5
Screen size
2.4"
2.5"
Screen resolution
230,400 dots
230,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
microSD, microSDHC
SD/SDHC/MMC Card
USB
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
2x AAA
NB-4L Li-ion battery
Weight
98 g
165 g
Dimensions
90.3 x 63 x 25.3 mm
87 x 55 x 22 mm
Year
2011
2008
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Nikon Coolpix S31
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Nikon Coolpix S30
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Rollei Sportsline 62
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Nikon Coolpix L25
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Kodak EasyShare C135
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Nikon Coolpix S33
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Rollei Compactline 52
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Canon EOS 40D
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
| Diagonal = √ | w² + h² |
Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage diagonal
The diagonal of Sportsline 60 Camouflage sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 6.16² + 4.62² | = 7.70 mm |
Canon IXUS 80 IS diagonal
The diagonal of IXUS 80 IS sensor is not 1/2.5 or 0.4" (10.2 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of
that value - 7.19 mm. If you want to know why, see
sensor sizes.
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
w = 5.75 mm
h = 4.32 mm
| Diagonal = √ | 5.75² + 4.32² | = 7.19 mm |
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
Sportsline 60 Camouflage sensor area
Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
Height = 4.62 mm
Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²
IXUS 80 IS sensor area
Width = 5.75 mm
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Height = 4.32 mm
Surface area = 5.75 × 4.32 = 24.84 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
| Pixel pitch = | sensor width in mm | × 1000 |
| sensor resolution width in pixels |
Sportsline 60 Camouflage pixel pitch
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 6.16 | × 1000 | = 2.39 µm |
| 2579 |
IXUS 80 IS pixel pitch
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3262 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 3262 pixels
| Pixel pitch = | 5.75 | × 1000 | = 1.76 µm |
| 3262 |
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
| Pixel area = | sensor surface area in mm² |
| effective megapixels |
Sportsline 60 Camouflage pixel area
Pixel pitch = 2.39 µm
Pixel area = 2.39² = 5.71 µm²
Pixel area = 2.39² = 5.71 µm²
IXUS 80 IS pixel area
Pixel pitch = 1.76 µm
Pixel area = 1.76² = 3.1 µm²
Pixel area = 1.76² = 3.1 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = ( | sensor resolution width in pixels | )² / 1000000 |
| sensor width in cm |
One could also use this formula:
| Pixel density = | effective megapixels × 1000000 | / 10000 |
| sensor surface area in mm² |
Sportsline 60 Camouflage pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 2579 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (2579 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 17.53 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.616 cm
Pixel density = (2579 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 17.53 MP/cm²
IXUS 80 IS pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 3262 pixels
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (3262 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 32.18 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 0.575 cm
Pixel density = (3262 / 0.575)² / 1000000 = 32.18 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
| (X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → |
|
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
Sportsline 60 Camouflage sensor resolution
Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 1939 × 1.33 = 2579
Resolution vertical: X = 1939
Sensor resolution = 2579 x 1939
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 5.00
| r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 1939
Sensor resolution = 2579 x 1939
IXUS 80 IS sensor resolution
Sensor width = 5.75 mm
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 8.00
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2453 × 1.33 = 3262
Resolution vertical: X = 2453
Sensor resolution = 3262 x 2453
Sensor height = 4.32 mm
Effective megapixels = 8.00
| r = 5.75/4.32 = 1.33 |
|
Resolution vertical: X = 2453
Sensor resolution = 3262 x 2453
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
| Crop factor = | 43.27 mm |
| sensor diagonal in mm |
Sportsline 60 Camouflage crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 5.62 |
| 7.70 |
IXUS 80 IS crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.19 mm
| Crop factor = | 43.27 | = 6.02 |
| 7.19 |
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
Sportsline 60 Camouflage equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f2.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8) × 5.62 = f15.7
Aperture = f2.8
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8) × 5.62 = f15.7
IXUS 80 IS equivalent aperture
Crop factor = 6.02
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f29.5
Aperture = f2.8 - f4.9
35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f4.9) × 6.02 = f16.9 - f29.5
More comparisons of Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage:
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Fujifilm FinePix Z3
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Canon PowerShot S230 DIGITAL ELPH
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Nikon Coolpix S2800
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Rollei Sportsline 90
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Fujifilm FinePix XP60
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. GE G3WP
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Ricoh Caplio 400G Wide
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
- Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage vs. Praktica Dpix 5000 WP
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.