Sony Mavica FD-88 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V

Comparison

change cameras »
Mavica FD-88 image
vs
Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V image
Sony Mavica FD-88 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
check price » check price »
Megapixels
1.20
16.80
Max. image resolution
1280 x 960
4608 x 3456

Sensor

Sensor type
CCD
CMOS
Sensor size
1/3" (~ 4.8 x 3.6 mm)
1/2.3" (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
Sensor resolution
1264 x 950
4727 x 3554
Diagonal
6.00 mm
7.70 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »
vs
1 : 1.65
(ratio)
Sony Mavica FD-88 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
Surface area:
17.28 mm² vs 28.46 mm²
Difference: 11.18 mm² (65%)
HX9V sensor is approx. 1.65x bigger than Mavica FD-88 sensor.
Note: You are comparing sensors of vastly different generations. There is a gap of 12 years between Sony Mavica FD-88 (1999) and Sony HX9V (2011). Twelve years is a huge amount of time, technology wise, resulting in newer sensor being much more efficient than the older one.
Pixel pitch
3.8 µm
1.3 µm
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Difference: 2.5 µm (192%)
Pixel pitch of Mavica FD-88 is approx. 192% higher than pixel pitch of HX9V.
Pixel area
14.44 µm²
1.69 µm²
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 12.75 µm² (754%)
A pixel on Sony Mavica FD-88 sensor is approx. 754% bigger than a pixel on Sony HX9V.
Pixel density
6.93 MP/cm²
58.89 MP/cm²
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Difference: 51.96 µm (750%)
Sony HX9V has approx. 750% higher pixel density than Sony Mavica FD-88.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.



Specs

Sony Mavica FD-88
Sony HX9V
Crop factor
7.21
5.62
Total megapixels
1.30
Effective megapixels
1.20
Optical zoom
7.9x
16x
Digital zoom
Yes
Yes
ISO sensitivity
100
Auto, 100 - 3200
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
4 cm
50 cm
Macro focus range
4 cm
5 cm
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
34 - 270 mm
24 - 384 mm
Aperture priority
No
Yes
Max. aperture
f2.8 - f3.0
f3.3 - f5.9
Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)
f20.2 - f21.6
f18.5 - f33.2
Metering
Multi, Center-weighted, Spot
Centre weighted, Multi-segment, Spot
Exposure compensation
±1.5 EV (in 1/2 EV steps)
±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
No
Yes
Min. shutter speed
1/60 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/1600 sec
Built-in flash
External flash
Viewfinder
None
None
White balance presets
3
7
Screen size
2.5"
3"
Screen resolution
84,000 dots
921,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
Storage types
Disk 3.5" (4x speed)
Memory Stick Duo, Memory Stick Pro Duo, SDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
USB
USB 1.0
USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
InfoLithium (NP-F330)
Lithium-Ion NP-BG1 battery
Weight
600 g
215 g
Dimensions
142 x 107 x 73 mm
105 x 59 x 34 mm
Year
1999
2011




Choose cameras to compare

vs

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
Diagonal =  w² + h²
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Sony Mavica FD-88 diagonal

The diagonal of Mavica FD-88 sensor is not 1/3 or 0.33" (8.5 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 6 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 4.80 mm
h = 3.60 mm
Diagonal =  4.80² + 3.60²   = 6.00 mm

Sony HX9V diagonal

The diagonal of HX9V sensor is not 1/2.3 or 0.43" (11 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.7 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 6.16 mm
h = 4.62 mm
Diagonal =  6.16² + 4.62²   = 7.70 mm


Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

Mavica FD-88 sensor area

Width = 4.80 mm
Height = 3.60 mm

Surface area = 4.80 × 3.60 = 17.28 mm²

HX9V sensor area

Width = 6.16 mm
Height = 4.62 mm

Surface area = 6.16 × 4.62 = 28.46 mm²


Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =   sensor width in mm  × 1000
sensor resolution width in pixels

Mavica FD-88 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 4.80 mm
Sensor resolution width = 1264 pixels
Pixel pitch =   4.80  × 1000  = 3.8 µm
1264

HX9V pixel pitch

Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor resolution width = 4727 pixels
Pixel pitch =   6.16  × 1000  = 1.3 µm
4727


Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =   sensor surface area in mm²
effective megapixels

Mavica FD-88 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 3.8 µm

Pixel area = 3.8² = 14.44 µm²

HX9V pixel area

Pixel pitch = 1.3 µm

Pixel area = 1.3² = 1.69 µm²


Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel density =  ( sensor resolution width in pixels )² / 1000000
sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =   effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000
sensor surface area in mm²

Mavica FD-88 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 1264 pixels
Sensor width = 0.48 cm

Pixel density = (1264 / 0.48)² / 1000000 = 6.93 MP/cm²

HX9V pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 4727 pixels
Sensor width = 0.616 cm

Pixel density = (4727 / 0.616)² / 1000000 = 58.89 MP/cm²


Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000    →   
X =  effective megapixels × 1000000
r
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

Mavica FD-88 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 4.80 mm
Sensor height = 3.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 1.20
r = 4.80/3.60 = 1.33
X =  1.20 × 1000000  = 950
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 950 × 1.33 = 1264
Resolution vertical: X = 950

Sensor resolution = 1264 x 950

HX9V sensor resolution

Sensor width = 6.16 mm
Sensor height = 4.62 mm
Effective megapixels = 16.80
r = 6.16/4.62 = 1.33
X =  16.80 × 1000000  = 3554
1.33
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 3554 × 1.33 = 4727
Resolution vertical: X = 3554

Sensor resolution = 4727 x 3554


Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =   43.27 mm
sensor diagonal in mm


Mavica FD-88 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 6.00 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 7.21
6.00

HX9V crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.70 mm
Crop factor =   43.27  = 5.62
7.70

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

Mavica FD-88 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 7.21
Aperture = f2.8 - f3.0

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f2.8 - f3.0) × 7.21 = f20.2 - f21.6

HX9V equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 5.62
Aperture = f3.3 - f5.9

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.3 - f5.9) × 5.62 = f18.5 - f33.2

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.